Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov 24;8(12):350.
doi: 10.3390/toxins8120350.

Worldwide Mycotoxins Exposure in Pig and Poultry Feed Formulations

Affiliations
Review

Worldwide Mycotoxins Exposure in Pig and Poultry Feed Formulations

Philippe Guerre. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to present information about raw materials that can be used in pig and poultry diets and the factors responsible for variations in their mycotoxin contents. The levels of mycotoxins in pig and poultry feeds are calculated based on mycotoxin contamination levels of the raw materials with different diet formulations, to highlight the important role the stage of production and the raw materials used can have on mycotoxins levels in diets. Our analysis focuses on mycotoxins for which maximum tolerated levels or regulatory guidelines exist, and for which sufficient contamination data are available. Raw materials used in feed formulation vary considerably depending on the species of animal, and the stage of production. Mycotoxins are secondary fungal metabolites whose frequency and levels also vary considerably depending on the raw materials used and on the geographic location where they were produced. Although several reviews of existing data and of the literature on worldwide mycotoxin contamination of food and feed are available, the impact of the different raw materials used on feed formulation has not been widely studied.

Keywords: diet; exposure; feed; feed substitution; mycotoxin; pig; poultry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consequences of a difference in sensitivity for descriptive statistics of mycotoxin contents. (A) Method of analysis with a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 50 µg/kg (old method); (B) method of analysis with an LOQ of 1 µg/kg (new method).

References

    1. Bennett J.W., Klich M. Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003;16:497–516. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.3.497-516.2003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Commission Directive 2003/100/EC. [(accessed on 11 August 2016)]. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003L0100&....
    1. Commission Recommendation of 17 August 2006 on the Presence of Deoxynivalenol, Zearalenone, Ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and Fumonisins in Products Intended for Animal Feeding. [(accessed on 11 August 2016)]. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006H0576&....
    1. Commission Recommendation of 27 March 2013 on the Presence of T-2 and HT-2 Toxin in Cereals and Cereal Products. [(accessed on 11 August 2016)]. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013H0165&....
    1. FDA Mycotoxin Regulatory Guidance, August 2011. [(accessed on 11 August 2016)]. Available online: https://www.ngfa.org/wp-content/uploads/NGFAComplianceGuide-FDARegulator....

LinkOut - more resources