Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 25;15(1):116.
doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0198-9.

Portable air cleaners should be at the forefront of the public health response to landscape fire smoke

Prabjit K Barn  1   2 , Catherine T Elliott  3 , Ryan W Allen  4 , Tom Kosatsky  5   6 , Karen Rideout  5   6 , Sarah B Henderson  5
Affiliations

Portable air cleaners should be at the forefront of the public health response to landscape fire smoke

Prabjit K Barn et al. Environ Health. .

Abstract

Landscape fires can produce large quantities of smoke that degrade air quality in both remote and urban communities. Smoke from these fires is a complex mixture of fine particulate matter and gases, exposure to which is associated with increased respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The public health response to short-lived smoke events typically advises people to remain indoors with windows and doors closed, but does not emphasize the use of portable air cleaners (PAC) to create private or public clean air shelters. High efficiency particulate air filters and electrostatic precipitators can lower indoor concentrations of fine particulate matter and improve respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes. We argue that PACs should be at the forefront of the public health response to landscape fire smoke events.

Keywords: HEPA filters; Intervention; Landscape fire smoke; Portable air cleaners; Wildfire smoke.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Elliott C. Guidance for BC public health decision makers during wildfire smoke events. Vancouver: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control; 2014.
    1. Liu YQ, Stanturf J, Goodrick S. Trends in global wildfire potential in a changing climate. For Ecol Manage. 2010;259(4):685–97. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.002. - DOI
    1. Liu JC, Pereira G, Uhl SA, Bravo MA, Bell ML. A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke. Environ Res. 2015;136:120–32. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reid CE, Brauer M, Johnston FH, Jerrett M, Balmes JR, Elliott CT. Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(9):1334–43. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409277. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnston F, Hanigan I, Henderson S, Morgan G, Bowman D. Extreme air pollution events from bushfires and dust storms and their association with mortality in Sydney, Australia 1994-2007. Environ Res. 2011;111(6):811–6. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.05.007. - DOI - PubMed