Implications of vessel co-option in sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma
- PMID: 27887628
- PMCID: PMC5124233
- DOI: 10.1186/s40880-016-0162-7
Implications of vessel co-option in sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma
Abstract
The reason why tumors generally have a modest or transient response to antiangiogenic therapy is not well understood. This poses a major challenge for sorafenib treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) where alternate therapies are lacking. We recently published a paper entitled "Co-option of liver vessels and not sprouting angiogenesis drives acquired sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma" in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, providing a potential explanation for this limited benefit. We found that in mice bearing HCCs that had acquired resistance to sorafenib, tumors had switched from using angiogenesis for growth to co-opting the liver vasculature by becoming more invasive. Accumulating evidence suggests that many human tumor types may use vessel co-option, which has profound implications for the use of anti-angiogenic agents for cancer treatment.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Non-angiogenic; Resistance; Sorafenib; Vessel co-option.
Figures
References
-
- Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):25–34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Brizzi MP, Pignataro D, Tampellini M, Scagliotti GV, DiMaio M. Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: why so many failures in the development of new drugs? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016;1:1–10. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
