Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 May 30;8(22):36728-36742.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13574.

Factors that influence treatment delay in patients with colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Factors that influence treatment delay in patients with colorectal cancer

Irene Zarcos-Pedrinaci et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

A prospective study was performed of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), distinguishing between colonic and rectal location, to determine the factors that may provoke a delay in the first treatment (DFT) provided.2749 patients diagnosed with CRC were studied. The study population was recruited between June 2010 and December 2012. DFT is defined as time elapsed between diagnosis and first treatment exceeding 30 days.Excessive treatment delay was recorded in 65.5% of the cases, and was more prevalent among rectal cancer patients. Independent predictor variables of DFT in colon cancer patients were a low level of education, small tumour, ex-smoker, asymptomatic at diagnosis and following the application of screening. Among rectal cancer patients, the corresponding factors were primary school education and being asymptomatic.We conclude that treatment delay in CRC patients is affected not only by clinicopathological factors, but also by sociocultural ones. Greater attention should be paid by the healthcare provider to social groups with less formal education, in order to optimise treatment attention.

Keywords: cancer; colorectal; delay; education; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Frequency histogram of delay (in days) to first treatment for patients with CRC

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Verdecchia A, Francisci S, Brenner H, Gatta G, Micheli A, Mangone L, Kunkler I, Group EW. Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000-02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Lancet Oncol. 2007(8):784–796. - PubMed
    1. Andrews BT, Bates T. Delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer: medico-legal implications. Breast. 2000(9):223–37. - PubMed
    1. Esteva M, Ramos M, Cabeza E, Llobera J, Ruiz A, Pita S, Segura J, Cortes J, Gonzalez-Lujan L, DECCIRE research group Factors influencing delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2007(7):86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pita Fernández S, Pértega Díaz S, López Calviño B, González Santamaría P, Seoane Pillado T, Arnal Monreal F, Maciá F, Sánchez Calavera MA, Espí Macías A, Valladares Ayerbes M, Pazos A, Reboredo López M, González Saez L, et al. Diagnosis delay and follow-up strategies in colorectal cancer. Prognosis implications: a study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2010(10):6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macià F, Pumarega J, Gallén M, Porta M. Time from (clinical or certainty) diagnosis to treatment onset in cancer patients: the choice of diagnostic date strongly influences differences in therapeutic delay by tumor site and stage. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013(66):928–39. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances