Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct;19(Suppl 1):S15-S20.
doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.192886.

Preventing medico-legal issues in clinical practice

Affiliations
Review

Preventing medico-legal issues in clinical practice

Bevinahalli N Raveesh et al. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

The medical profession is considered to be one of the noblest professions in the world. The practice of medicine is capable of rendering noble service to humanity provided due care, sincerity, efficiency, and professional skill is observed by the doctors. However, today, the patient-doctor relationship has almost diminished its fiduciary character and has become more formal and structured. Doctors are no longer regarded as infallible and beyond questioning. Corporatization of health care has made it like any other business, and the medical profession is increasingly being guided by the profit motive rather than that of service. On the other hand, a well-publicized malpractice case can ruin the doctor's career and practice. The law, like medicine, is an inexact science. One cannot predict with certainty an outcome of cases many a time. It depends on the particular facts and circumstances of the case, and also the personal notions of the judge concerned who is hearing the case. The axiom "you learn from your mistakes" is too little honored in healthcare. The best way to handle medico-legal issues is by preventing them, and this article tries to enumerate the preventive measures in safeguarding the doctor against negligence suit.

Keywords: Courts; doctors; medical negligence; prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sharma R. Delhi High Court. Smt. Madhubala vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. 2005. [Last cited on 2016 Sep 14]. Available from: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1286575/
    1. Panta LS. Supreme Court of India. Kirplani & Ors. 2009. [Last cited on 2016 Sep 14]. Available from: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1226604/
    1. Shelat Supreme Court of India. Laxman Balkrishna Joshi vs Trimbak Bapu Godbole And Anr. 1968. [Last cited on 2016 Sep 14]. Available from: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/297399/
    1. Balachandran MK. Consumer Protection Act and Medical Profession, Department of Consumer Affairs, Govt. of India in association with I.I.P.A. New Delhi: 2008.
    1. Rao CK, editor. Corpus juris secundum. Law of Negligence. 2nd ed. Allahabad: The Law Book Company; 1991. p. 14.p. 322.