Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct;10(10):OE01-OE07.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21915.8429. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Evidences in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

Affiliations
Review

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Evidences in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

Bhargav Dave. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary revascularization strategies have gradually progressed over a period of last few decades. The advent of newer generation drug-eluting stents has significantly improved the outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) by substantially reducing in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. However, vascular inflammation, restenosis, thrombosis, and neoatherosclerosis due to the permanent presence of a metallic foreign body within the artery limit their usage in complex Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). Bioresorbable Scaffolds (BRS) represent a novel approach in coronary stent technology. Complete resorption of the scaffold liberates the treated vessel from its cage and restores pulsatility, cyclical strain, physiological shear stress, and mechanotransduction. In this review article, we describe the advances in this rapidly evolving technology, present the evidence from the pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of these devices, and provide an overview of the ongoing clinical trials that were designed to examine the effectiveness of BRS in the clinical setting.

Keywords: Bioabsorbable vascular scaffold; Coronary stents; Percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gruntzig A. Transluminal dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis. Lancet (London, England) 1978;1(8058):263. - PubMed
    1. Gruntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1979;301(2):61–68. - PubMed
    1. Sigwart U, Urban P, Golf S, Kaufmann U, Imbert C, Fischer A, et al. Emergency stenting for acute occlusion after coronary balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 1988;78(5 Pt 1):1121–27. - PubMed
    1. Roubin GS, Cannon AD, Agrawal SK, Macander PJ, Dean LS, Baxley WA, et al. Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1992;85(3):916–27. - PubMed
    1. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1994;331(8):489–95. - PubMed