Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul;112(7):1128-1135.
doi: 10.1111/add.13623. Epub 2016 Nov 27.

Understanding and learning from the diversification of cannabis supply laws

Beau Kilmer  1 , Rosalie Liccardo Pacula  1
Affiliations
Review

Understanding and learning from the diversification of cannabis supply laws

Beau Kilmer et al. Addiction. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aims: Prohibitions on producing, distributing and selling cannabis are loosening in various jurisdictions around the world. This paper describes the diversification of cannabis supply laws and discusses the challenges to and opportunities for learning from these changes.

Methods: We document changes in cannabis supply laws that de jure legalized cannabis production for medical and/or non-medical purposes (excluding industrial hemp) in Australasia, Europe, North America and South America. We also highlight challenges to evaluating these legal changes based on our experiences studying cannabis laws and policies in the United States.

Findings: As of August 2016, two countries have passed laws to legalize large-scale cannabis production for non-medical purposes at the national (Uruguay) or subnational level (four US states). At least nine other countries legally allow (or will soon allow) cannabis to be supplied for medicinal purposes. Most of the changes in cannabis supply laws have occurred since 2010. The data available in most countries are inadequate for rigorously evaluating the changes in cannabis supply laws.

Conclusion: The evidence base for assessing changes in cannabis supply laws remains weak. Efforts should focus upon collecting information about quantities consumed and market transactions as well as validating self-report surveys.

Keywords: Cannabis; legalization; marijuana; policy analysis; program evaluation; surveys; validating self-reported data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Alternatives to status quo prohibition of marijuana supply. Source: reproduced from [19]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. MacCoun RJ, Reuter P. Drug War Heresies: Learning From Other Vices, Times, and Places. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
    1. MacCoun RJ, Reuter P. Assessing drug prohibition and its alternatives: a guide for agnostics. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci. 2011;7:61–78.
    1. Pacula R, MacCoun R, Reuter P, Chriqui J, Kilmer B, Harris K, et al. What does it mean to decriminalize marijuana? A cross-national empirical examination. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2005;16:347–69. - PubMed
    1. Room R, Fischer B, Hall W, Lenton S, Reuter P. Cannabis Policy: Moving Beyond the Stalemate. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
    1. MacCoun RJ, Saiger AJ, Kahan JP, Reuter P. Drug Policies and Problems: The Promise and Pitfalls of Cross-National Comparison. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 1993.