Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;59(6):512-518.
doi: 10.5468/ogs.2016.59.6.512. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

Laparoscopic tube-preserving surgical procedures for ectopic tubal pregnancy

Affiliations

Laparoscopic tube-preserving surgical procedures for ectopic tubal pregnancy

Taejong Song et al. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To present our experience with laparoscopic tube-preserving surgery for ectopic tubal pregnancy and evaluate its feasibility and efficacy.

Methods: This was a prospective study of 57 consecutive patients with ectopic tubal pregnancies undergoing laparoscopic tube-preserving procedures including salpingotomy, salpingostomy, segmental resection and reanastomosis, and fimbrial milking. The outcome measures were treatment success rates and homolateral patency rates.

Results: Of the 57 surgical procedures, 55 (96.4%) were performed successfully without any additional intervention. The number of patients receiving salpingotomy, salpingostomy, segmental resection and reanastomosis, and fimbrial milking were 24 (42.1%), 25 (43.9%), 4 (7.0%), and 2 (3.5%), respectively. Two case was switched to salpingectomy because excessive bipolar coagulation was required to obtain hemostasis at the tubal bleeding bed. Over a mean β-human chorionic gonadotropin resolution time of 18.3±5.9 days, no persistent trophoblast or postoperative complications occurred. A tubal patency test using hysterosalpingography was performed in 15 cases at 3 months postoperatively. Among these, the homolateral tubal patency rate was 75% (11 of 15) and the contralateral patency rate was 80% (12 of 15).

Conclusion: Tube-preserving surgery is a feasible and safe treatment option for ectopic tubal pregnancy. However, considering that the optimal goal of tube-preserving surgical procedures is not the treatment success, some caution is warranted in interpreting results of this study.

Keywords: Ectopic pregnancy; Salpingectomy; Salpingostomy; Tubal pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Walker JJ. Ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50:89–99. - PubMed
    1. Al-Sunaidi M, Tulandi T. Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25:117–122. - PubMed
    1. Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet. 2005;366:583–591. - PubMed
    1. Fylstra DL, Soper DE. Ectopic pregnancy. In: Gilstrap LC, Cunningham FG, Vandorsten JP, editors. Operative obstetrics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): McGraw-Hill; 2002. pp. 355–378.
    1. Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD000324. - PMC - PubMed