Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;47(3):306-312.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3746-0. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

Assessing colonic anatomy normal values based on air contrast enemas in children younger than 6 years

Affiliations

Assessing colonic anatomy normal values based on air contrast enemas in children younger than 6 years

Ilan J N Koppen et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Contrast enemas with barium or water-soluble contrast agents are sometimes performed in children with severe intractable constipation to identify anatomical abnormalities. However there are no clear definitions for normal colonic size or abnormalities such as colonic dilation or sigmoid redundancy in children.

Objective: To describe characteristics of colonic anatomy on air contrast enemas in children without constipation to provide normal values for colonic size ratios in children.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of children aged 0-5 years who had undergone air contrast enemas for intussusception. The primary outcome measures were the ratios of the diameters and lengths of predetermined colonic segments (lengths of rectosigmoid and descending colon; diameters of rectum, sigmoid, descending colon, transverse colon and ascending colon) in relation to the L2 vertebral body width.

Results: We included 119 children (median age 2.0 years, range 0-5 years, 68% boys). Colonic segment length ratios did not change significantly with age, although the differences for the rectosigmoid/L2 ratio were borderline significant (P = 0.05). The ratios that involved the rectal and ascending colon diameters increased significantly with age, while diameter ratios involving the other colonic segments did not. Differences by gender and race were not significant.

Conclusion: These data can be used for reference purposes in young children undergoing contrast studies of the colon.

Keywords: Children; Colon; Contrast enema; Dilatation; Normal values; Rectum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Method of colonic size ratio measurements. a A schematic depiction of the colonic size characteristics that were assessed. b The image from an air contrast enema from one of the children from this study. Lines indicate characteristics that were measured to calculate the colonic diameter ratios. A ascending colon diameter, D descending colon diameter, L2 width vertebral body L2, R rectum diameter, S sigmoid colon diameter, T transverse colon diameter
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient selection process

Comment in

References

    1. Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.12.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van den Berg MM, Hogan M, Caniano DA, et al. Colonic manometry as predictor of cecostomy success in children with defecation disorders. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:730–736. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Radwan AB, El-Debeiky MS, Abdel-Hay S. Contrast enema as a guide for senna-based laxatives in managing overflow retentive stool incontinence in pediatrics. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015;31:765–771. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3741-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. von der Ohe MR, Camilleri M, Carryer PW. A patient with localized megacolon and intractable constipation: evidence for impairment of colonic muscle tone. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:1867–1870. - PubMed
    1. Nguyen L, Shandling B. Segmental dilation of the colon: a rare cause of chronic constipation. J Pediatr Surg. 1984;19:539–540. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3468(84)80099-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources