Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;26(1):48-65.
doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0335-1.

Why Health and Social Care Support for People with Long-Term Conditions Should be Oriented Towards Enabling Them to Live Well

Affiliations

Why Health and Social Care Support for People with Long-Term Conditions Should be Oriented Towards Enabling Them to Live Well

Vikki A Entwistle et al. Health Care Anal. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

There are various reasons why efforts to promote "support for self-management" have rarely delivered the kinds of sustainable improvements in healthcare experiences, health and wellbeing that policy leaders internationally have hoped for. This paper explains how the basis of failure is in some respects built into the ideas that underpin many of these efforts. When (the promotion of) support for self-management is narrowly oriented towards educating and motivating patients to adopt the behaviours recommended for disease control, it implicitly reflects and perpetuates limited and somewhat instrumental views of patients. It tends to: restrict the pursuit of respectful and enabling 'partnership working'; run the risk of undermining patients' self-evaluative attitudes (and then of failing to notice that as harmful); limit recognition of the supportive value of clinician-patient relationships; and obscure the practical and ethical tensions that clinicians face in the delivery of support for self-management. We suggest that a focus on enabling people to live (and die) well with their long-term conditions is a promising starting point for a more adequate conception of support for self-management. We then outline the theoretical advantages that a capabilities approach to thinking about living well can bring to the development of an account of support for self-management, explaining, for example, how it can accommodate the range of what matters to people (both generally and more specifically) for living well, help keep the importance of disease control in perspective, recognize social influences on people's values, behaviours and wellbeing, and illuminate more of the rich potential and practical and ethical challenges of supporting self-management in practice.

Keywords: Capabilities approach; Chronic conditions; Patient participation; Person centred care; Professional-patient relations; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

    1. Atkin K, Stapley S, Easton A. “No one listens to me, nobody believes me”: Self-management and the experience of living with encephalitis. Social Science and Medicine. 2010;71(2):386–393. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, Seid M, Armstrong G, Opipari-Arrigan L, Hartung H. Co-production of healthcare service. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2015 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: Care, health, and cost. Health Affairs. 2008;27(3):759–769. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyle D, Harris M. The challenge of co-production. London: NESTA; 2009.
    1. Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness. 1982;4(2):167–182. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources