Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;11(6):838-854.
doi: 10.1177/1745691616650285.

Using Smartphones to Collect Behavioral Data in Psychological Science: Opportunities, Practical Considerations, and Challenges

Affiliations
Review

Using Smartphones to Collect Behavioral Data in Psychological Science: Opportunities, Practical Considerations, and Challenges

Gabriella M Harari et al. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Smartphones now offer the promise of collecting behavioral data unobtrusively, in situ, as it unfolds in the course of daily life. Data can be collected from the onboard sensors and other phone logs embedded in today's off-the-shelf smartphone devices. These data permit fine-grained, continuous collection of people's social interactions (e.g., speaking rates in conversation, size of social groups, calls, and text messages), daily activities (e.g., physical activity and sleep), and mobility patterns (e.g., frequency and duration of time spent at various locations). In this article, we have drawn on the lessons from the first wave of smartphone-sensing research to highlight areas of opportunity for psychological research, present practical considerations for designing smartphone studies, and discuss the ongoing methodological and ethical challenges associated with research in this domain. It is our hope that these practical guidelines will facilitate the use of smartphones as a behavioral observation tool in psychological science.

Keywords: behavior; big data; mobile sensing; research design; smartphones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example set up of a smartphone-sensing system. EMA = ecological-momentary assessments.

References

    1. Bakke E. A model and measure of mobile communication competence. Human Communication Research. 2010;36:348–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01379.x. - DOI
    1. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Funder DC. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2007;2:396–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ben-Zeev D, Brenner CJ, Begale M, Duffecy J, Mohr DC, Mueser KT. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2014;40:1244–1253. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernard HR, Killworth PD, Sailer L. Informant accuracy in social network data IV: A comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive network data. Social Networks. 1980;2:191–218. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(79)90014-5. - DOI
    1. Bernard HR, Killworth PD, Sailer L. Informant accuracy in social-network data V. An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data. Social Science Research. 1982;11:30–66. doi: 10.1016/0049-089X(82)90006-0. - DOI

Publication types