Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 17;6(2):236-240.
doi: 10.11138/mltj/2016.6.2.236. eCollection 2016 Apr-Jun.

Surgical time for graft preparation using different suture techniques

Affiliations

Surgical time for graft preparation using different suture techniques

Lawrence Camarda et al. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to compare the operative time for graft preparation using different techniques for graft suturing.

Material and methods: Flexor profundus tendons were harvested from fresh pig hind-leg trotters. Three different suture techniques were investigated: the Krackow stitch (K), the Whipstitch (W), and the Modified Finger-Trap suture (MFT). Tendons were sutured starting at 10 mm from the distal free end of the tendon. The suture configurations of the Krackow stitch and Whipstitch were completed with five suture throws. According to the MFT technique, the suture was wrapped five times around the tendon over a distance of 30 mm. The time required to perform a complete suture on each tendon was measured. Five independent examiners of different levels of training measured the time required for graft preparation during 3 separate occasions to determine intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility.

Results: The mean time required for graft preparation following the Krackow technique was 69.1 seconds ± 18.3 SD (range 31.8-120). The Whipstitch technique took an average of 59.9 seconds ± 21.2 SD (range 27-93). The MFT suture required a mean of 29.3 seconds ± 11.4 SD for completing the suture (range 21.6-33). In all examiners the time required to complete the MFT suture was significantly less than the other suture techniques (p < 0.05). Intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients for each examiner ranged from 0.72 to 0.83.

Conclusion: Low graft preparation time is required to complete a MFT suture in a porcine tendon model. Further, time required for graft preparation using the MFT was shorter than other suturing techniques such as the Krackow and Whipstitch techniques.

Clinical relevance: The MFT suture could be used for graft set-up with the main advantage of reducing the time required in comparison with other suture techniques.

Keywords: fiberwire; grasping tendon; krackow suture; modified finger-trap; suture tendon; suturing tendon; whipstitching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three different suture techniques were investigated: the Krackow stitch (K), the Whipstitch (W), and the Modified Finger-Trap suture (MFT).

References

    1. Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2321–2328. - PubMed
    1. Bait C, Denti M, Prospero E, Quaglia A, Orgiani A, Volpi P. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with “all-inside” technique: a technical note. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2015;4:467–740. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tudisco C, Bisicchia S, Cosentino A, Chiozzi F, Piva M. Knee stability, athletic performance and sport-specific tasks in non-professional soccer players after ACL reconstruction: comparing trans-tibial and antero-medial portal techniques. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2015;5:175–180. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simonian PT, Harrison SD, Cooley VJ, Escabedo EM, Deneka DA, Larson RV. Assessment of morbidity of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10:54–59. - PubMed
    1. Hallam P, Bain GI. Repair of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures using autologous hamstring graft and the Endobutton. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:648–651. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources