Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;32(3):325-332.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2708-1. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

Oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer patients with a ≤1-cm distal resection margin

Affiliations

Oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer patients with a ≤1-cm distal resection margin

Dong Woo Kang et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, common application of sphincter-saving resection in rectal cancer has led to acceptance of a 1-cm distal resection margin (DRM). The aim of this study was to evaluate oncologic outcomes of a DRM ≤1 cm in sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. The outcomes of a DRM ≤0.5 cm was also evaluated.

Methods: We reviewed prospectively collected data from 415 patients who underwent sphincter-saving resection for mid and low rectal cancer between September 2006 and December 2012 at Korea University Anam Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups according to DRM measured in a formalin fixed specimen: ≤1 cm (n = 132) and >1 cm (n = 283). The DRM ≤1 cm group was divided into two subgroups: ≤0.5 cm (n = 45) and >0.5, ≤1 cm (n = 87).

Results: Median follow-up periods were 47.2 months. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 8.8% in the DRM ≤1 cm group and 8.5% in the DRM >1 cm group (p = 0.630). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 75.1 and 76.3% (p = 0.895), and the 5-year overall survival rate was 82.6 and 85.9% (p = 0.401), respectively. In subanalysis of the DRM ≤1 cm group, there was also no significant difference in the local recurrence and survival.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in local recurrence and survival based on DRM length. We found that DRM length less than 1 cm was not a prognostic factor for local recurrence or survival.

Keywords: Distal resection margin; Oncologic outcomes; Rectal neoplasm; Sphincter-saving resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jul 15;44(5):1027-38 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2001 Nov;234(5):633-40 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):658-63; discussion 663-4 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2002 Mar;89(3):327-34 - PubMed
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1990 May;5(2):103-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources