Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep;21(7):2235-2243.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-2016-8. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Gizem Erbas Unverdi et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the clinical retention of a resin-based fissure sealant placed with an intermediate layer of etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etch (SE) adhesives.

Materials and methods: Two hundred twenty-eight sealants were placed in 57 children with previously unsealed, caries-free permanent first molars, employing a split-mouth design. The teeth were randomized into four groups (n = 57 teeth/groups) according to the adhesive system placed under the tested sealant (Delton FS+; Dentsply). Group 1 (control): no bonding agent (conventional acid-etch sealant); group 2: prior enamel etch + ER adhesive (XP Bond; Dentsply); group 3: SE adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond; Kuraray) without prior etching; and group 4: prior enamel etch + SE adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Clinical assessments were performed according to modified USPHS criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The data were analyzed statistically using Fisher's Exact test, the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the Log-rank test.

Results: At 24 months, sealants bonded with XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond with prior enamel etching showed similar retention rates (p > 0.05), and these rates were significantly better than the rates of the conventional sealant and Clearfil-SE groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the retention rates of the latter two groups (p > 0.05). The cumulative survival rates on palatal/buccal surfaces showed similar outcomes as with occlusal surfaces: XP Bond (94%), Clearfil SE Bond + acid-etch (94%), conventional sealant (52%), and Clearfil SE Bond only (37%).

Conclusions: Application of the tested ER adhesive and the SE adhesive with enamel etching significantly improved the clinical retention of Delton-FS over the 24-month period.

Clinical relevance: The use of a resin-based fissure sealant placed with ER or SE adhesive with prior acid-etching yielded better retention than the conventional sealant over the 24-month period.

Keywords: Adhesive systems; Clinical study; Fissure sealant; Intermediate bonding layer; Retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oper Dent. 2004 May-Jun;29(3):309-16 - PubMed
    1. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(1):32-41; discussion 42 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Dent. 1992 Jan-Feb;14(1):41-6 - PubMed
    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980 Jan;100(1):34-8 - PubMed
    1. Dent Mater. 2012 Mar;28(3):298-303 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources