Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Apr;22(2):95-100.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000224.

Methodological evaluation of the noninvasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure in nontreated patients: the Bogalusa Heart Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Methodological evaluation of the noninvasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure in nontreated patients: the Bogalusa Heart Study

Camilo Fernandez et al. Blood Press Monit. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to compare the estimation of central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) obtained by two different noninvasive devices, in addition to its comparisons with measured peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP), in a biracial (Black/White) community-based cohort.

Participants and methods: Estimations of cSBP by applanation tonometry were obtained in 586 participants of the Bogalusa Heart Study (mean age: 43.5 years; 69% White, 54% women) using two different commonly used instruments: Omron HEM-9000AI and SphygmoCor CPV. pSBP was measured using a standard auscultatory technique.

Results: The estimation of cSBP by the Omron device was higher than that of the SphygmoCor device (124.2±17.1 vs. 111.4±15.2 mmHg, P<0.001). Moreover, cSBP by Omron was significantly higher than peripheral blood pressure (124.2±17.1 vs. 119.4±15.6 mmHg, P<0.001), whereas cSBP by SphygmoCor was significantly lower than pSBP (111.4±15.2 vs. 119.4±15.6 mmHg, P<0.001). Similar results were observed in race-specific and sex-specific analyses.

Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that notable differences exist in the estimation of cSBP provided by the instruments utilized in this study. Further standardization studies are required to establish the most appropriate noninvasive estimation of cSBP before this parameter may be considered in the assessment, prediction, and prevention of cardio-metabolic risk and overt cardiovascular disease in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest / Disclosures:

Authors have no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Mean comparisons of central systolic blood pressure (Omron vs. SphygmoCor) and peripheral systolic blood pressure (auscultatory)
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Race- and Sex- specific mean comparisons of central systolic blood pressure (Omron vs. SphygmoCor) and peripheral systolic blood pressure (auscultatory) *, comparison between cSBP Omron and cSBP Sphygmocor (p<0.001) †, comparison between cSBP Omron and pSBP Auscultatory (p<0.001) ‡, comparison between cSBP Sphygmocor and pSBP Auscultatory (p<0.001) cSBP, central systolic blood pressure; pSBP, peripheral systolic blood pressure
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Correlation of cSBP by Omron and Sphygmocor by sex group. r, correlation coefficient; R2, coefficient of determination cSBP Omron, central systolic blood pressure obtained by the Omron HEM 9000 AI instrument; cSBP Sphygmocor, central systolic blood pressure obtained by the Sphygmocor CPV instrument.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Correlation of cSBP by Omron and Sphygmocor by race group. r, correlation coefficient; R2, coefficient of determination cSBP Omron, central systolic blood pressure obtained by the Omron HEM 9000 AI instrument; cSBP Sphygmocor, central systolic blood pressure obtained by the Sphygmocor CPV instrument.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sharman JE, Laurent S. Central blood pressure in the management of hypertension: soon reaching the goal? J Hum Hypertens. 2013;27:405–11. - PubMed
    1. Cho SW, Kim BK, Kim JH, Byun YS, Goh CW, Rhee KJ, Ahn HS, Lee BK, Kim BO. Non-invasively measured aortic wave reflection and pulse pressure amplification are related to the severity of coronary artery disease. J Cardiol. 2013;62:131–7. - PubMed
    1. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Galloway JM, Ali T, Umans JG, Howard BV. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2007;50:197–203. - PubMed
    1. Gallagher D, Adji A, O’Rourke MF. Validation of the transfer function technique for generating central from peripheral upper limb pressure waveform. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:1059–1067. - PubMed
    1. Salvi P Is validation of non-invasive hemodynamic measurement devices actually required? Hypertens Res. 2013;37:7–9. - PubMed