Methodological evaluation of the noninvasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure in nontreated patients: the Bogalusa Heart Study
- PMID: 27902495
- PMCID: PMC7528040
- DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000224
Methodological evaluation of the noninvasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure in nontreated patients: the Bogalusa Heart Study
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to compare the estimation of central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) obtained by two different noninvasive devices, in addition to its comparisons with measured peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP), in a biracial (Black/White) community-based cohort.
Participants and methods: Estimations of cSBP by applanation tonometry were obtained in 586 participants of the Bogalusa Heart Study (mean age: 43.5 years; 69% White, 54% women) using two different commonly used instruments: Omron HEM-9000AI and SphygmoCor CPV. pSBP was measured using a standard auscultatory technique.
Results: The estimation of cSBP by the Omron device was higher than that of the SphygmoCor device (124.2±17.1 vs. 111.4±15.2 mmHg, P<0.001). Moreover, cSBP by Omron was significantly higher than peripheral blood pressure (124.2±17.1 vs. 119.4±15.6 mmHg, P<0.001), whereas cSBP by SphygmoCor was significantly lower than pSBP (111.4±15.2 vs. 119.4±15.6 mmHg, P<0.001). Similar results were observed in race-specific and sex-specific analyses.
Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that notable differences exist in the estimation of cSBP provided by the instruments utilized in this study. Further standardization studies are required to establish the most appropriate noninvasive estimation of cSBP before this parameter may be considered in the assessment, prediction, and prevention of cardio-metabolic risk and overt cardiovascular disease in clinical practice.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest / Disclosures:
Authors have no potential conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparison of noninvasive assessments of central blood pressure using general transfer function and late systolic shoulder of the radial pressure wave.Am J Hypertens. 2014 Feb;27(2):162-8. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt166. Epub 2013 Sep 2. Am J Hypertens. 2014. PMID: 23999585
-
Comparison of central pressure estimates obtained from SphygmoCor, Omron HEM-9000AI and carotid applanation tonometry.J Hypertens. 2011 Jun;29(6):1115-20. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328346a3bc. J Hypertens. 2011. PMID: 21505351
-
Associations of plasma homocysteine levels with peripheral systolic blood pressure and noninvasive central systolic blood pressure in a community-based Chinese population.Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 24;7(1):6316. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06611-3. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28740096 Free PMC article.
-
Estimation of central aortic blood pressure: a systematic meta-analysis of available techniques.J Hypertens. 2014 Sep;32(9):1727-40. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000249. J Hypertens. 2014. PMID: 24937639 Review.
-
Association of cardiovascular events with central systolic blood pressure: A systemic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Jul;26(7):747-756. doi: 10.1111/jch.14853. Epub 2024 Jun 17. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024. PMID: 38884940 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sharman JE, Laurent S. Central blood pressure in the management of hypertension: soon reaching the goal? J Hum Hypertens. 2013;27:405–11. - PubMed
-
- Cho SW, Kim BK, Kim JH, Byun YS, Goh CW, Rhee KJ, Ahn HS, Lee BK, Kim BO. Non-invasively measured aortic wave reflection and pulse pressure amplification are related to the severity of coronary artery disease. J Cardiol. 2013;62:131–7. - PubMed
-
- Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Galloway JM, Ali T, Umans JG, Howard BV. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2007;50:197–203. - PubMed
-
- Gallagher D, Adji A, O’Rourke MF. Validation of the transfer function technique for generating central from peripheral upper limb pressure waveform. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:1059–1067. - PubMed
-
- Salvi P Is validation of non-invasive hemodynamic measurement devices actually required? Hypertens Res. 2013;37:7–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous