Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis
- PMID: 27903539
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005121
Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines define severe aortic stenosis in patients with aortic valve area normalized to body surface area (AVA/BSA) <0.6 cm2/m2; yet, this cutoff has never been validated. Moreover, it is not known whether AVA normalization to other body size indexes allows improved outcome prediction. We aim to test the value of AVA normalized to body size for outcome prediction in asymptomatic aortic stenosis.
Methods and results: We included 289 patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, preserved ejection fraction, and AVA<1.3 cm2 at diagnosis. The outcome measure was the occurrence of aortic valve replacement or all-cause death or during follow-up. AVA was normalized to BSA, height, weight, and body mass index. For each normalized index, patients in the lowest tertile were at high risk of events whereas outcome was similar for the other tertiles. High risk of events was observed with AVA/BSA <0.4 cm2/m2 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.42 [2.09-5.60]), AVA/height <0.45 cm2/m (adjusted HR, 3.99 [2.42-6.60]), AVA/weight <0.01 cm2/kg (adjusted HR, 3.37 [2.07-5.49]), and AVA/body mass index <0.029 cm2/kg per meter square (adjusted HR, 3.23 [1.99-5.24]). Mortality risk was high with AVA/height <0.45 cm2/m (adjusted HR, 2.18 [1.28-3.71]), followed by AVA/BSA <0.40 cm2/m2 (adjusted HR, 1.84 [1.09-3.11]), AVA/weight <0.01 cm2/kg (adjusted HR, 1.78 [1.07-2.98]), and AVA/body mass index <0.029 cm2/kg per meter square (adjusted HR, 1.75 [1.04-2.93]). AVA/height showed better predictive performance than AVA/BSA with improved reclassification and better discrimination (net reclassification improvement: 0.33 versus 0.28; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.10 versus 0.08; C statistic: 0.67 versus 0.65), whereas AVA/weight and AVA/body mass index showed lower predictive capacity.
Conclusions: Among AVA normalization methods, AVA/height <0.45 cm2/m followed by AVA/BSA <0.40 cm2/m2 seem as robust parameters for defining high risk in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. The prognostic value of AVA/height deserves future research.
Keywords: aortic valve; aortic valve stenosis; asymptomatic conditions; echocardiography; prognosis.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.
Comment in
-
Aortic Valve Area Index: A Partial Answer to an Enigma.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):e005686. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005686. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27903544 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area by Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 3;5(5):e003146. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003146. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27143354 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Mean Transaortic Pressure Gradient on Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):e005850. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005850. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28572283 Free PMC article.
-
Adjusting parameters of aortic valve stenosis severity by body size.Heart. 2014 Jul;100(13):1024-30. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305225. Epub 2014 Apr 29. Heart. 2014. PMID: 24780909
-
Watchful waiting care or early intervention in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: Where we are.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jan;114(1):59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Nov 3. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021. PMID: 33153947 Review.
-
Management of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Evolving Concepts in Timing of Valve Replacement.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;13(2 Pt 1):481-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Jun 12. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31202751 Review.
Cited by
-
Paradoxical Aortic Stenosis: Simplifying the Diagnostic Process.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 May;110(5):484-486. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180075. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29898047 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Asymptomatic aortic stenosis: An assessment of patients' and of their general practitioners' knowledge, after an indexed specialized assessment in community practice.PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178932. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28582434 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Procedural Success Definitions on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis Treated With Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e031433. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031433. Epub 2024 Aug 9. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39119978 Free PMC article.
-
An alternative method of indexation in aortic stenosis: height-adjusted effective orifice area : An observational prospective study.Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2023 Aug 22;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12947-023-00314-8. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2023. PMID: 37605158 Free PMC article.
-
Echocardiographic Imaging Challenges in Obesity: Guideline Recommendations and Limitations of Adjusting to Body Size.J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 21;9(2):e014609. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014609. Epub 2020 Jan 9. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. PMID: 31914879 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources