Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec 22;81(1):3-11.
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1002. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction - Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Prognosis, Diagnosis, Risk Factors and Therapy

Affiliations
Review

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction - Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Prognosis, Diagnosis, Risk Factors and Therapy

Cheng Chen et al. Circ J. .

Abstract

Angina has traditionally been thought to be caused by obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, a substantial number of patients with angina are found to not have obstructive CAD when undergoing coronary angiography. A significant proportion of these patients have coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), characterized by heightened sensitivity to vasoconstrictor stimuli and limited microvascular vasodilator capacity. With the advent of non-invasive and invasive techniques, the coronary microvasculature has been more extensively studied in the past 2 decades. CMD has been identified as a cause of cardiac ischemia, in addition to traditional atherosclerotic disease and vasospastic disease. CMD can occur alone or in the presence obstructive CAD. CMD shares many similar risk factors with macrovascular CAD. Diagnosis is achieved through detection of an attenuated response of coronary blood flow in response to vasodilatory agents. Imaging modalities such as cardiovascular magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography have become more widely used, but have not yet completely replaced the traditional intracoronary vasoreactivity testing. Treatment of CMD starts with lifestyle modification and risk factor control. The use of traditional antianginal, antiatherosclerotic medications and some novel agents may be beneficial; however, clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapeutic modalities. In addition, studies with longer-term follow-up are needed to determine the prognostic benefits of these agents. We review the epidemiology, prognosis, pathogenesis, diagnosis, risk factors and current therapies for CMD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Comparison of cardiovascular event rates and deaths between WISE and WTH patients. CV, cardiovascular; HF, heart failure; MI, myocardial infarction; WISE, Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation study; WTH, Women Take Heart study. Modified with permission from Gulati M, et al.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Anatomy of coronary macrovascular and microvascular circulation: epicardial coronary artery (solid arrow) dilates in response to nitroglycerin, acetylcholine, shear stress; intramyocardial arterioles (striped arrow) are responsive to local metabolites and responsible for metabolic regulation of coronary blood flow.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion images demonstrating dark-rim artifact (red arrows) eliminated by high radial acquisition in a normal control subject, and improved subendocardial border delineation (green arrows) in a WISE subject. WISE, Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation study.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Proposed diagnostic criteria of coronary dysfunction using reactivity testing. CBF, coronary blood flow; CFR, coronary flow reserve; EKG, electrocardiography.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Coronary angiograms and coronary reactivity testing: baseline (A); severe abnormal vasoconstriction (arrow) in response to acetylcholine (B); resolution of vasoconstriction with intracoronary nitroglycerin (C).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Day LJ, Sowton E. Clinical features and follow-up of patients with angina and normal coronary arteries. Lancet 1976; 2: 334–337. - PubMed
    1. Bemiller CR, Pepine CJ, Rogers AK. Long-term observations in patients with angina and normal coronary arteriograms. Circulation 1973; 47: 36–43. - PubMed
    1. Murthy VL, Naya M, Taqueti VR, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, et al. Effects of sex on coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiac outcomes. Circulation 2014; 129: 2518–2527. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation 2000; 101: 948–954. - PubMed
    1. Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, Gaber M, Di Carli G, et al. Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2011; 124: 2215–2224. - PMC - PubMed