Robot-assisted surgery in elderly and very elderly population: our experience in oncologic and general surgery with literature review
- PMID: 27905087
- DOI: 10.1007/s40520-016-0676-5
Robot-assisted surgery in elderly and very elderly population: our experience in oncologic and general surgery with literature review
Abstract
Background: Although there is no agreement on a definition of elderly, commonly an age cutoff of ≥65 or 75 years is used. Nowadays most of malignancies requiring surgical treatment are diagnosed in old population. Comorbidities and frailty represent well-known problems during and after surgery in elderly patients. Minimally invasive surgery offers earlier postoperative mobilization, less blood loss, lower morbidity as well as reduction in hospital stay and as such represents an interesting and validated option for elderly population. Robot-assisted surgery is a recent improvement of conventional minimally invasive surgery.
Aims: We provided a complete review of old and very old patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery for oncologic and general surgery interventions.
Patients and methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery in our General Surgery Unit from September 2012 to June 2016 was conducted. Analysis was performed for the entire cohort and in particular for three of the most performed surgeries (gastric resections, right colectomy, and liver resections) classifying patients into three age groups: ≤64, 65-79, and ≥80. Data from these three different age groups were compared and examined in respect of different outcomes: ASA score, comorbidities, oncologic outcomes, conversion rate, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, geriatric events, mortality, etc.
Results: Using our in-patient robotic surgery database, we retrospectively examined 363 patients, who underwent robot-assisted surgery for different diseases (402 different robotic procedures): colorectal surgery, upper GI, HPB, etc.; the oncologic procedures were 81%. Male were 56%. The mean age was 65.63 years (18-89). Patients aged ≥65 years represented 61% and ≥80 years 13%. Overall conversion rate was of 6%, most in the group 65-79 years (59% of all conversions). The more frequent diseases treated were colorectal surgery 43%, followed by hepatobilopancreatic surgery 23.4%, upper gastro-intestinal 23.2%, and others 10.4%.
Discussion: Robot-assisted surgery is a safe and effective technique in aging patient population too. There was no increased risk of death or morbidity compared to younger patients in the three groups examined. A higher conversion rate was observed in our experience for patients aged 65-79. Prolonged operative time and in any cases steep positions (Trendelenburg) have not represented a problem for the majority of patients.
Conclusions: In any case, considering the high direct costs, minimally invasive robot-assisted surgery should be performed on a case-by-case basis, tailored to each patient with their specific histories and comorbidities.
Keywords: Aging population; Cancer; Elderly; Geriatric; Minimal invasive surgery; Robotic surgery.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2741-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z. Epub 2013 Mar 14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23494081
-
Colorectal surgery in elderly patients: our experience with DaVinci Xi® System.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Feb;29(Suppl 1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0670-y. Epub 2016 Nov 26. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017. PMID: 27888474
-
Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):949-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jun 8. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27287246
-
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5601-5614. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4892-z. Epub 2016 Jul 11. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 27402096 Review.
-
The role of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients.Minerva Chir. 2018 Apr;73(2):179-187. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07594-6. Epub 2018 Jan 23. Minerva Chir. 2018. PMID: 29366312 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictive value of preoperative weight loss on survival of elderly patients undergoing surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Dec;8(8):2752-2758. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.10.29. Transl Cancer Res. 2019. PMID: 35117032 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature.World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug 17;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00555-6. World J Emerg Surg. 2024. PMID: 39154016 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 13;11(6):552. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060552. J Pers Med. 2021. PMID: 34199314 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Physical Activity on Disability Risk in Elderly Patients Hospitalized for Mild Acute Diverticulitis and Diverticular Bleeding Undergone Conservative Management.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 8;57(4):360. doi: 10.3390/medicina57040360. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 33917780 Free PMC article.
-
Clinico-pathological Features of Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery: A Comparison Between Elderly and Non-elderly Patients.Open Med (Wars). 2019 Oct 2;14:726-734. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0082. eCollection 2019. Open Med (Wars). 2019. PMID: 31637303 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources