Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2016 Nov;29(8):913-919.
doi: 10.1111/dote.12540.

Recommendations for clinical staging (cTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals

Thomas W Rice  1 , Hemant Ishwaran  2 , Eugene H Blackstone  1 , Wayne L Hofstetter  3 , David P Kelsen  4 , Carolyn Apperson-Hansen  5 ; Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration Investigators
Collaborators, Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Recommendations for clinical staging (cTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals

Thomas W Rice et al. Dis Esophagus. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

We report analytic and consensus processes that produced recommendations for clinical stage groups (cTNM) of esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer for the AJCC/UICC cancer staging manuals, 8th edition. The Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration (WECC) provided data on 22,123 clinically staged patients with epithelial esophageal cancers. Risk-adjusted survival for each patient was developed using random survival forest analysis from which (1) data-driven clinical stage groups were identified wherein survival decreased monotonically and was distinctive between and homogeneous within groups and (2) data-driven anatomic clinical stage groups based only on cTNM. The AJCC Upper GI Task Force, by smoothing, simplifying, expanding, and assessing clinical applicability, produced (3) consensus clinical stage groups. Compared with pTNM, cTNM survival was "pinched," with poorer survival for early cStage groups and better survival for advanced ones. Histologic grade was distinctive for data-driven grouping of cT2N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and cT1-2N0M0 adenocarcinoma, but consensus removed it. Grouping was different by histopathologic cell type. For SCC, cN0-1 was distinctive for cT3 but not cT1-2, and consensus removed cT4 subclassification and added subgroups 0, IVA, and IVB. For adenocarcinoma, N0-1 was distinctive for cT1-2 but not cT3-4a, cStage II subgrouping was necessary (T1N1M0 [IIA] and T2N0M0 [IIB]), advanced cancers cT3-4aN0-1M0 plus cT2N1M0 comprised cStage III, and consensus added subgroups 0, IVA, and IVB. Treatment decisions require accurate cStage, which differs from pStage. Understaging and overstaging are problematic, and additional factors, such as grade, may facilitate treatment decisions and prognostication until clinical staging techniques are uniformly applied and improved.

Keywords: adenocarcinoma; esophageal malignancy; squamous cell carcinoma; staging; statistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Risk-adjusted survival of data-driven clinical stage groups. A, Squamous cell carcinoma. B, Adenocarcinoma.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk-adjusted survival of data-driven anatomic clinical stage groups. A, Squamous cell carcinoma. B, Adenocarcinoma.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk-adjusted survival of consensus clinical stage groups. A, Squamous cell carcinoma. B, Adenocarcinoma.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. Geneva: UICC; 1968.
    1. Strong VE, D’amico TA, Kleinberg L, Ajani J. Impact of the 7th edition AJCC staging classification on the NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology for gastric and esophageal cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11:60–6. - PubMed
    1. Rice TW, Blackstone EH. Esophageal cancer staging: past, present, and future. Thorac Surg Clin. 2013;23:461–9. - PubMed
    1. Rice TW, Apperson-Hansen C, DiPaola LM, et al. Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration: clinical staging data. Dis Esophagus. 2016;7:707–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldman AI. Eventcharts: visualizing survival and other timed-event data. Am Stat. 1992;46:13–8.

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources