Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul;101(7):1551-1558.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001582.

Selection of Patients for Initial Clinical Trials of Solid Organ Xenotransplantation

Affiliations
Review

Selection of Patients for Initial Clinical Trials of Solid Organ Xenotransplantation

David K C Cooper et al. Transplantation. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Several groups have reported extended survival of genetically engineered pig organs in nonhuman primates, varying from almost 10 months for life-supporting kidney grafts and more than 2 years for non-life-supporting heart grafts to less than 1 month for life-supporting liver and lung grafts. We have attempted to define groups of patients who may not have an option to wait for an allograft. These include kidney, heart, and lung candidates who are highly-allosensitized. In addition, some kidney candidates (who have previously lost at least 2 allografts from rapid recurrence of native kidney disease) have a high risk of further recurrence and will not be offered a repeat allotransplant. Patients with complex congenital heart disease, who may have undergone previous palliative surgical procedures, may be unsuitable for ventricular assist device implantation. Patients dying of fulminant hepatic failure, for whom no alternative therapy is available, may be candidates for a pig liver, even if only as a bridge until an allograft becomes available. When the results of pig organ xenotransplantation in nonhuman primates suggest a realistic potential for success of a pilot clinical trial, highly selected patients should be offered participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Ekser B, Cooper DK, Tector AJ. The need for xenotransplantation as a source of organs and cells for clinical transplantation. Int J Surg. 2015;23:199–204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper DK, Ezzelarab MB, Hara H, et al. The pathobiology of pig-to-primate xenotransplantation: a historical review. Xenotransplantation. 2016;23:83–105. - PubMed
    1. Cooper DK, Ekser B, Ramsoondar J, Phelps C, Ayares D. The role of genetically-engineered pigs in xenotransplantation research. J Pathol. 2016;238:288–299. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Satyananda V, Hara H, Ezzelarab MB, Phelps C, Ayares D, Cooper DK. New concepts of immune modulation in xenotransplantation. Transplantation. 2013;96:937–945. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohiuddin MM, Singh AK, Corcoran PC, et al. Role of anti-CD40 antibody-mediated costimulation blockade on non-Gal antibody production and heterotopic cardiac xenograft survival in a GTKO.hCD46Tg pig-to-baboon model. Xenotransplantation. 2014;21:35–45. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms