Effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin to prevent pulmonary embolism following major trauma: A propensity-matched analysis
- PMID: 27906870
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001321
Effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin to prevent pulmonary embolism following major trauma: A propensity-matched analysis
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of delayed mortality in patients with severe injury. While low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is often favored over unfractionated heparin (UH) for thromboprophylaxis, evidence is lacking to demonstrate an effect on the occurrence of PE. This study compared the effectiveness of LMWH versus UH to prevent PE in patients following major trauma.
Methods: Data for adults with severe injury who received thromboprophylaxis with LMWH or UH were derived from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2012-2015). Patients who died or were discharged within 5 days were excluded. Rates of PE were compared between propensity-matched LMWH and UH groups. Subgroup analyses included patients with blunt multisystem injury, penetrating truncal injury, shock, severe traumatic brain injury, and isolated orthopedic injury. A center-level analysis was performed to determine if practices with respect to choice of prophylaxis type influence hospital PE rates.
Results: We identified 153,474 patients at 217 trauma centers who received thromboprophylaxis with LMWH or UH. Low-molecular-weight heparin was given in 74% of patients. Pulmonary embolism occurred in 1.8%. Propensity score matching yielded a well-balanced cohort of 75,920 patients. After matching, LMWH was associated with a significantly lower rate of PE compared with UH (1.4% vs. 2.4%; odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.63). This finding was consistent across injury subgroups. Trauma centers in the highest quartile of LMWH utilization (median LMWH use, 95%) reported significantly fewer PE compared with centers in the lowest quartile (median LMWH use, 39%; 1.2% vs. 2.0%; odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.74).
Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis with LMWH (vs. UH) was associated with significantly lower risk of PE. Trauma centers favoring LMWH-based prophylaxis strategies reported lower rates of PE. Low-molecular-weight heparin should be the anticoagulant agent of choice for prevention of PE in patients with major trauma.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic study, level III.
Similar articles
-
Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in pediatric traumatic brain injury.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021 Feb 12;27(4):469-474. doi: 10.3171/2020.9.PEDS20615. Print 2021 Apr 1. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 33578391
-
Unfractionated heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):151-158. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001494. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017. PMID: 28426561 Free PMC article.
-
A tale of two centers: Is low-molecular-weight heparin really superior for prevention of posttraumatic venous thromboembolism?J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Sep 1;91(3):537-541. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003257. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021. PMID: 33901051
-
[Prevention of venous thromboembolism in polytraumatized patients. Epidemiology and importance].Presse Med. 2000 Jan 22;29(2):68-75. Presse Med. 2000. PMID: 10682030 Review. French.
-
Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):338S-400S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.338S. Chest. 2004. PMID: 15383478 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison between CT and MRI in the assessment of pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(52):e8935. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008935. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29384894 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic and therapeutic approach in adult patients with traumatic brain injury receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: an Austrian interdisciplinary consensus statement.Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2352-6. Crit Care. 2019. PMID: 30795779 Free PMC article.
-
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the trauma intensive care unit: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee Clinical Consensus Document.Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Feb 24;6(1):e000643. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000643. eCollection 2021. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021. PMID: 33718615 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of antithrombin III and enoxaparin dosage adjustment on prophylactic anti-Xa concentrations in trauma patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism: a randomized pilot trial.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Nov;52(4):1117-1128. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02478-4. Epub 2021 May 12. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021. PMID: 33978907 Clinical Trial.
-
Timing of femoral shaft fracture fixation following major trauma: A retrospective cohort study of United States trauma centers.PLoS Med. 2017 Jul 5;14(7):e1002336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002336. eCollection 2017 Jul. PLoS Med. 2017. PMID: 28678793 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials