Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Oct 18;126(11):854-861.
doi: 10.20452/pamw.3589. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

Serum concentrations of receptor for interleukin 8 in patients with esophageal cancer

Free article
Comparative Study

Serum concentrations of receptor for interleukin 8 in patients with esophageal cancer

Marta Łukaszewicz-Zając et al. Pol Arch Med Wewn. .
Free article

Abstract

INTRODUCTION A specific receptor for interleukin 8, known as C-X-C chemokine type‑2 receptor (CXCR‑2), is one of the 7‑transmembrane G‑protein‑coupled receptors. Its involvement in the development of numerous malignancies, including esophageal cancer (EC), has been suggested. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of serum CXCR‑2 level measurement in patients with EC, in comparison with C‑reactive protein (CRP) levels and classic tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC‑Ag). PATIENTS AND METHODS The study included 72 individuals: 42 patients with EC and 30 healthy volunteers. Serum CXCR‑2 concentrations were measured by an immunoenzymatic assay. The levels of classic tumor markers were measured using the chemiluminescent method, and CRP levels were measured using the immunoturbidimetric method. RESULTS Serum CXCR‑2 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with EC than in the control group, similarly to CEA and CRP levels. Moreover, CXCR‑2 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with poorly differentiated EC (G3) compared with those with G2 tumors. The diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy, as well as the negative predictive value of the serum CXCR‑2 assay were higher than those observed for classic tumor markers and slightly lower than those observed for CRP levels. The highest diagnostic sensitivity was found for the combined analysis of CXCR‑2 and CRP. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest the role of CXCR‑2 in the development of EC. Thus, further research is needed to clarify the significance of chemokines and their receptors as potential tumor markers of EC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Not easy to become a tumor marker.
    Solnica B. Solnica B. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2016 Nov 30;126(11):845-846. doi: 10.20452/pamw.3699. Epub 2016 Nov 30. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2016. PMID: 27906876 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources