Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;31(11):2570-2576.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew231. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

Reducing the number of fetuses in a pregnancy: providers' and patients' views of challenges

Robert L Klitzman  1
Affiliations

Reducing the number of fetuses in a pregnancy: providers' and patients' views of challenges

Robert L Klitzman. Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Study question: How do patients and providers perceive and make decisions about possible reductions of multi-fetal pregnancies?

Summary answer: Physicians may be transferring additional embryos, assuming that patients will later undergo reduction if need be; but decisions to reduce pregnancies are difficult for patients, who may agree to undergo the procedure in advance and later renege.

What is already known: Implanting more than one embryo increases the likelihood that at least one embryo will successfully lead to a child but also that the patient may end up with twins or higher-order multiple births.

Study design, size, duration: In-depth interviews of ~1 h each were conducted with 37 ART providers and patients (17 physicians, 10 other health providers and 10 patients) and systematically analyzed.

Participants/materials, setting, method: The telephone interviews explored the participants' views and decisions regarding pregnancy reduction. The answers were analyzed systematically.

Main results and the role of chance: Providers may be transferring additional embryos, thinking that doing so will increase the likelihood of a 'take home baby' and that the patients could undergo reductions, if need be, to avoid the risks and complications of twins or multiple births. Yet patients often appear to have difficulty confronting the prospect of fetal reduction and/or renege on prior agreements to undergo the procedure. Providers should thus be wary and exceedingly careful about these situations.

Limitations, reasons for caution: The sample size was sufficient for qualitative research designed to elucidate the issues and themes that emerge, but not for statistically analyzing how various groups may differ (e.g. physicians versus patients). Future studies should investigate these issues with larger samples.

Wider implications of the findings: These data, the first to examine how IVF providers and patients view and approach decisions regarding the reduction of fetuses, suggest several complications and dilemmas. This information has critical implications for future practice, guidelines, research and education of providers, patients, insurers, policymakers and others.

Study funding/competing interests: Funding was provided by grant #UL1 RR024156 from the National Center for Research Resources, the Greenwall Foundation and the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Keywords: embryos; ethics; in-vitro fertilization; multiple pregnancy; policy; twins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Challenges concerning reduction of fetuses.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Antsaklis A, Souka AP, Daskalakis G, Papantoniou N, Koutra P, Kavalakis Y, Mesogitis S. Pregnancy outcome after multifetal pregnancy reduction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;16:27–31. - PubMed
    1. Balasubramanyam S. Knowledge and attitudes of women towards multiple embryo transfer, fetal reduction and multiple pregnancy. Int J Infertility Fetal Med 2010;1:31–34.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2013 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. Atlanta, Georgia; US Department of Health and Human Services, 2015 http://www.cdc.gov/art/pdf/2013-report/art_2013_national_summary_report.pdf (9 September 2016, date last accessed).
    1. De Neubourg D, Peeraer K, Debrock S, D'Hooghe T. Belgium model of coupling reimbursement of ART costs to restriction in number of embryos transferred. BMJ 2014;348:g1559. - PubMed
    1. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Comparative Analysis of Medically Assisted Reproduction in the EU: Regulation and Technologies – Final Report (2009). http://ec.europa.eu/health/blood_tissues_organs/docs/study_eshre_en.pdf. (8 August 2016, date last accessed).

Publication types