Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;45(1):91-98.
doi: 10.1159/000453554. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

The Impact of Health Care Appointment Non-Adherence on Graft Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation

Affiliations

The Impact of Health Care Appointment Non-Adherence on Graft Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation

David J Taber et al. Am J Nephrol. 2017.

Abstract

Background: Non-adherence to medication is a well-studied and known cause of late allograft loss, but it is difficult to measure and prospectively monitor. The aim of this study was to assess if appointment non-adherence was correlated with medication non-adherence and a predictor of graft outcomes.

Methods: This was a longitudinal cohort study that used the National United States Renal Data System and veterans affairs health records data with time-to-event analyses conducted to assess the impact on graft and patient survival.

Results: The number of transplants that were included in the analysis was 4,646 (3,656 with complete records); 14.6% of patients had an appointment no show rate of ≥12% (non-adherence). Appointment and medication non-adherence were highly correlated and both were significant independent predictors of outcomes. Those with appointment non-adherence had 1.5 times the risk of acute rejection (22.0 vs. 14.7%, p < 0.0001) and a 65% higher risk of graft loss (adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) 1.65, 95% CI 1.38-1.97, p < 0.0001). There was a significant interaction between appointment and medication non-adherence; those with appointment and medication non-adherence were at very high risk of graft loss (aHR 4.18, 95% CI 3.39-5.15, p < 0.0001), compared to those with only appointment non-adherence (aHR 1.39, 95% CI 0.97-2.01, p = 0.0766) or only medication non-adherence (aHR 2.44, 95% CI 2.11-2.81, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: These results demonstrate that non-adherence to health care appointments is a significant and independent risk factor for graft loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K23DK099440.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted* graft survival estimates compared between appointment adherence cohorts
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted* graft survival estimates compared between appointment and medication adherence cohorts

Comment in

References

    1. Sellares J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, Reeve J, Einecke G, et al. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:388–399. - PubMed
    1. Einecke G, Sis B, Reeve J, Mengel M, Campbell PM, et al. Antibody-mediated microcirculation injury is the major cause of late kidney transplant failure. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:2520–2531. - PubMed
    1. Gaynor J, Ciancio G, Guerra G, Sageshima J, Hanson L, et al. Graft failure due to noncompliance among 628 kidney transplant recipients with long-term follow-up: a single-center observational study. Transplantation. 2014;97:925–933. - PubMed
    1. Dew MA, DiMartini A, De Vito Dabbs A, Myaskobsky L, Steel J, et al. Rates and risk factors for nonadherence to the medical regimen after adult solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2007;83:858–873. - PubMed
    1. Butler JA, Roderick P, Mullee M, Mason JC, Peveler RC. Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation. 2004;77:769–776. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances