Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun 27;8(2):87-100.

Non-invasive methods for embryo selection

H N Sallam  1 , N H Sallam  2 , S H Sallam  2
Affiliations
Review

Non-invasive methods for embryo selection

H N Sallam et al. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. .

Abstract

With the widespread use of assisted reproduction, a simple and practical method for embryo selection is needed to optimize the chances of pregnancy while diminishing the incidence of multiple pregnancy and its accompanying problems. Many non-invasive methods for embryo selection have been proposed and some are more promising than others. This review summarizes these methods and attempts to evaluate them in the light of the best currently available evidence and to find out whether any of them is ripe for replacing or supplementing the time-honored method of morphological assessment.

Keywords: Embryo selection; metabolomics; morpho-kinetics; non-invasive; oxidative stress; sHLA-G; time lapse monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
— Embryo scoring at the pronuclear stage (Z1 = equal pronuclei, equal number and size of nucleoli, aligned in both pronuclei at the pronuclear junction, number of nucleoli 3 to 7; Z2 = equal pronuclei, equal number and size of nucleoli, scattered in both pronuclei, number of nucleoli 3 to 7; Z3 = equal pronuclei, equal number and even or (and) uneven size of nucleoli, aligned in one pronucleus at the pronuclear junction, number of nucleoli 3 to 7; Z4 = unequal or separated pronuclei) (from Scott et al., 2000).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
— Grading the embryo at the cleavage stage (from O’Leary et al., 2013)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
— Scoring the embryo at the blastocyst stage (from Gardner et al., 2000)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
— Amino acid depletion/appearance ± SEM by individual human embryos over the compacting 8-cell to morula transition which subsequently formed blastocysts (n = 23), or which arrested in culture prior to cavitation (n = 32). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 significance from zero (from Houghton et al., 2002).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
— Spectra of embryo culture media after day 3 and day 5 transfers (from Kirkegaard et al., 2014).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ahlström A, Wikland M, Rogberg L, et al. Cross-validation and predictive value of near-infrared spectroscopy algorithms for day-5 blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:447–484. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong S, Arroll N, Cree LM, et al. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD011320 - PubMed
    1. Balaban B, Urman B, Isiklar A, et al. The effect of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2357–2361. - PubMed
    1. Basile N, del Carmen NM, Bronet F, et al. Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:699–704. - PubMed
    1. Berger DS, Zapantis A, Merhi Z, et al. Embryo quality but not pronuclear score is associated with clinical pregnancy following IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:279–283. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources