Extended mortality results for prostate cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median follow-up of 15 years
- PMID: 27911486
- PMCID: PMC5725951
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30474
Extended mortality results for prostate cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median follow-up of 15 years
Abstract
Background: Two large-scale prostate cancer screening trials using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) have given conflicting results in terms of the efficacy of such screening. One of those trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, previously reported outcomes with 13 years of follow-up. This study presents updated findings from the PLCO trial.
Methods: The PLCO trial randomized subjects from 1993 to 2001 to an intervention or control arm. Intervention-arm men received annual PSA tests for 6 years and digital rectal examinations for 4 years. This study used a linkage with the National Death Index to extend mortality follow-up to a maximum of 19 years after randomization.
Results: Men were randomized to the intervention arm (n = 38,340) or the control arm (n = 38,343). The median follow-up time was 14.8 years (25th/75th, 12.7/16.5 years) in the intervention arm and 14.7 years (25th/75th, 12.6/16.4 years) in the control arm. There were 255 deaths from prostate cancer in the intervention arm and 244 deaths from prostate cancer in the control arm; this meant a rate ratio (RR) of 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.24). The RR for all-cause mortality was 0.977 (95% CI, 0.950-1.004). It was estimated that 86% of the men in the control arm and 99% of the men in the intervention arm received any PSA testing during the trial, and the estimated yearly screening-phase PSA testing rates were 46% and 84%, respectively.
Conclusions: Extended follow-up of the PLCO trial over a median of 15 years continues to indicate no reduction in prostate cancer mortality for the intervention arm versus the control arm. Because of the high rate of control-arm PSA testing, this finding can be viewed as showing no benefit of organized screening versus opportunistic screening. Cancer 2017;123:592-599. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: digital rectal examination (DRE); prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen (PSA); randomized trial; screening.
© 2016 This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Insights from the PLCO trial about prostate cancer screening.Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;123(4):546-548. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30472. Epub 2016 Dec 1. Cancer. 2017. PMID: 27906455 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review. [Accessed July 5th, 2016]; http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/
-
- Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:762–771. - PubMed
-
- Moyer VA U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Int Med. 2012;157:120–134. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous