Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 18;8(32):1392-1401.
doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i32.1392.

Novel non-invasive biological predictive index for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus genotype 4 patients

Affiliations

Novel non-invasive biological predictive index for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus genotype 4 patients

Mahmoud Khattab et al. World J Hepatol. .

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the diagnostic ability of a non-invasive biological marker to predict liver fibrosis in hepatitis C genotype 4 patients with high accuracy.

Methods: A cohort of 332 patients infected with hepatitis C genotype 4 was included in this cross-sectional study. Fasting plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and angiotensin-converting enzyme serum levels were measured. Insulin resistance was mathematically calculated using the homeostasis model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).

Results: Fibrosis stages were distributed based on Metavir score as follows: F0 = 43, F1 = 136, F2 = 64, F3 = 45 and F4 = 44. Statistical analysis relied upon reclassification of fibrosis stages into mild fibrosis (F0-F) = 179, moderate fibrosis (F2) = 64, and advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) = 89. Univariate analysis indicated that age, log aspartate amino transaminase, log HOMA-IR and log platelet count were independent predictors of liver fibrosis stage (P < 0.0001). A stepwise multivariate discriminant functional analysis was used to drive a discriminative model for liver fibrosis. Our index used cut-off values of ≥ 0.86 and ≤ -0.31 to diagnose advanced and mild fibrosis, respectively, with receiving operating characteristics of 0.91 and 0.88, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and positive likelihood ratio were: 73%, 91%, 75%, 90% and 8.0 respectively for advanced fibrosis, and 67%, 88%, 84%, 70% and 4.9, respectively, for mild fibrosis.

Conclusion: Our predictive model is easily available and reproducible, and predicted liver fibrosis with acceptable accuracy.

Keywords: Age; Aspartate amino transaminase; Insulin resistance; Liver fibrosis; Platelets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiving operating characteristic curve for discriminating mild fibrosis. At cut off value: -0.31 or more negative: AUC 0.88, 95%CI: 0.84 -0.91, sensitivity 67.2%, specificity 6.3%, PPV 83.6%, NPV 69.5%, PLR 4.9 and NLR 0.38. AUC: Area under the curve; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; PLR: Positive likelihood ratio; NLR: Negative likelihood ratio; ROC: Receiving operating characteristic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiving operating characteristic curve for discriminating advanced fibrosis. At cut off value > 0.86: AUC 0.91, 95%CI: 0.88-0.94, sensitivity 73%, specificity 90.9%, PPV 74.4%, NPV 90.1%, PLR 8.0 and NLR 0.3. PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; PLR: Positive likelihood ratio; NLR: Negative likelihood ratio; ROC: Receiving operating characteristic.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiving operating characteristic curve for discriminating moderate fibrosis. At cut off value > -0.31 up to +0.86: AUC 0.64, 95%CI: 0.61-0.74, sensitivity 53.1%, specificity 74.1%, PPV 33%, NPV 86.8%, PLR 2.0 and NLR 0.63. AUC: Area under the curve; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; PLR: Positive likelihood ratio; NLR: Negative likelihood ratio; ROC: Receiving operating characteristic.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lavanchy D. Evolving epidemiology of hepatitis C virus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:107–115. - PubMed
    1. Mohd Hanafiah K, Groeger J, Flaxman AD, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: new estimates of age-specific antibody to HCV seroprevalence. Hepatology. 2013;57:1333–1342. - PubMed
    1. Sievert W, Altraif I, Razavi HA, Abdo A, Ahmed EA, Alomair A, Amarapurkar D, Chen CH, Dou X, El Khayat H, et al. A systematic review of hepatitis C virus epidemiology in Asia, Australia and Egypt. Liver Int. 2011;31 Suppl 2:61–80. - PubMed
    1. Moreira RK. Hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:1728–1734. - PubMed
    1. Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1655–1669. - PMC - PubMed