Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 22:7:442.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00442. eCollection 2016.

A New Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) Model for Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury, Based on Statistical and Expert-Based Structural Alerts

Affiliations

A New Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) Model for Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury, Based on Statistical and Expert-Based Structural Alerts

Fabiola Pizzo et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

The prompt identification of chemical molecules with potential effects on liver may help in drug discovery and in raising the levels of protection for human health. Besides in vitro approaches, computational methods in toxicology are drawing attention. We built a structure-activity relationship (SAR) model for evaluating hepatotoxicity. After compiling a data set of 950 compounds using data from the literature, we randomly split it into training (80%) and test sets (20%). We also compiled an external validation set (101 compounds) for evaluating the performance of the model. To extract structural alerts (SAs) related to hepatotoxicity and non-hepatotoxicity we used SARpy, a statistical application that automatically identifies and extracts chemical fragments related to a specific activity. We also applied the chemical grouping approach for manually identifying other SAs. We calculated accuracy, specificity, sensitivity and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) on the training, test and external validation sets. Considering the complexity of the endpoint, the model performed well. In the training, test and external validation sets the accuracy was respectively 81, 63, and 68%, specificity 89, 33, and 33%, sensitivity 93, 88, and 80% and MCC 0.63, 0.27, and 0.13. Since it is preferable to overestimate hepatotoxicity rather than not to recognize unsafe compounds, the model's architecture followed a conservative approach. As it was built using human data, it might be applied without any need for extrapolation from other species. This model will be freely available in the VEGA platform.

Keywords: chemical clustering; drugs; hepatotoxicity; structural alerts; structure-activity relationship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification and validation of SAs for hepatotoxicity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Decision tree developed for the hepatotoxicity model. Hep stands for “hepatotoxic” and non-hep for “non-hepatotoxic.”
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentages of correctly predicted, wrongly predicted and non-predicted (unknown) compounds in the training, test and external validation sets.

References

    1. Amacher D. E., Alder R., Hearth A., Townsend R. R. (2005). Use of proteomic methods to identify serum biomarkers associated with rat liver toxicity or hypertrophy. Clin. Chem. 51, 1796–1803. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.049908 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambs S., Neumann H. G. (1996). Acute and chronic toxicity of aromatic amines studied in the isolated perfused rat liver. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 139, 186–194. 10.1006/taap.1996.0157 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson B. N., Henrikson I. R. (1978). Jaundice and eosinophilia associated with amitriptyline. J. Clin. Psychiatry 39, 730–731. - PubMed
    1. Bataller R., Brenner D. A. (2005). Liver fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 115, 209–218. 10.1172/JCI24282 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ball P., Mandell L., Niki Y., Tillotson G. (1999). Comparative Tolerability of the Newer Fluoroquinolone Antibacterials. Drug Saf. 21, 407–421. 10.2165/00002018-199921050-00005 - DOI - PubMed