Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Feb;112(2):365-374.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.542. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea

Brooks D Cash et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Eluxadoline is a mixed μ-opioid receptor (OR) and κ-OR agonist and δ-OR antagonist, approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). This analysis evaluated the safety and tolerability of eluxadoline 75 and 100 mg twice daily (BID) in one Phase 2 (IBS-2001) and two Phase 3 (IBS-3001 and IBS-3002) studies.

Methods: Adults with IBS-D (Rome III criteria) were randomized to placebo or eluxadoline (75 or 100 mg) BID for 12 (IBS-2001), 26 (IBS-3002), or 52 (IBS-3001) weeks. Safety data were pooled. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed, with special focus on opioid-related AEs, including suspected sphincter of Oddi spasm (SOS) events.

Results: 2,776 patients were included in the enrolled set; the safety set comprised 2,814 patients, based on actual treatments received. The most frequent AEs in the placebo and eluxadoline 75 and 100 mg groups were constipation (2.5, 7.4, and 8.1%, respectively) and nausea (5.0, 8.1, and 7.1%, respectively); discontinuation due to constipation was uncommon (0.3, 1.1, and 1.5%, respectively). Ten SOS events (10/1,839; 0.5%) occurred in eluxadoline-treated patients, manifesting as acute abdominal pain with elevated aminotransferases or lipase, or pancreatitis; all occurred in patients without a gallbladder. Eight of these events occurred with the higher dose of eluxadoline, within 1 week of initiation of therapy, and all resolved with eluxadoline discontinuation. There were five events independently adjudicated as pancreatitis not associated with SOS, three of which were associated with heavy alcohol use.

Conclusions: Eluxadoline was well tolerated in Phase 2 and 3 trials, with constipation and nausea the most common AEs. Consistent with the known adverse effects of opioid agonists, clinically apparent SOS events were observed in eluxadoline-treated patients. All occurred in patients without a gallbladder and the majority were observed in patients on the higher dose of eluxadoline, suggesting a possible association.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Guarantor of the article: Brooks D. Cash, MD.

Specific author contributions: Planning and conducting the study: Leonard S. Dove and Paul S. Covington; Collection and interpretation of data: Brooks D. Cash, Brian E. Lacy, Philip S. Schoenfeld, Leonard S. Dove, and Paul S. Covington; Drafting and revision of the manuscript: Brooks D. Cash, Brian E. Lacy, Philip S. Schoenfeld, Leonard S. Dove, and Paul S. Covington. All authors approved the final draft of this manuscript for submission.

Potential conflicts of interests: Brooks D. Cash has served as an advisor, consultant, or speaker for Actavis, Inc., a subsidiary of Allergan plc, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Prometheus Laboratories, IM HealthScience, and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals. Brian E. Lacy has participated in advisory boards for Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Prometheus Laboratories, Salix Pharmaceuticals, and Actavis, Inc., a subsidiary of Allergan plc. Philip S. Schoenfeld has served as an advisor, consultant, or speaker for Actavis, Inc., a subsidiary of Allergan plc, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, and Synthetic Biologics, and is a partner in MD Evidence. Leonard S. Dove and Paul S. Covington serve as scientific consultants for Allergan plc.

Financial support: These studies were supported by Furiex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Allergan plc. The sponsor was responsible for study design and data analysis, in collaboration with all authors. The collection and interpretation of the study data and writing of the manuscript was carried out by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of (a) AEs and (b) SAEs by time interval: pooled analysis for eluxadoline Phase 2 and 3 studies (safety set). For the Phase 2 study (IBS-2001) events were nominally reported up to the end of treatment visit at week 12 only (and not through the last follow-up visit at week 14), while for the Phase 3 studies events were counted up to the last visit (up to the week 54 visit in IBS-3001 and the week 30 visit in IBS-3002). AE, adverse event; BID, twice daily; SAE, serious adverse event.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence of constipation AEs by time:a,b pooled analysis for eluxadoline Phase 2 and 3 studies (safety set). aEach 3-month interval was defined as a 13-week period, starting from the date of the first dose of study drug; bIncidence was defined as number of patients with at least one constipation event, and for the patient-level summary, multiple occurrences of constipation within a patient are counted once only. All occurrences of constipation were included in the total number of constipation events. Percentages were based on patients being in the study for ≥1 day within a period (overall, each quarter). Patients receiving >1 treatment are included in summaries of each treatment. AE, adverse event; BID, twice daily.

Comment in

  • Response to Croteau and Barkin.
    Cash BD, Lacy BE, Schoenfeld PS, Dove LS, Covington PS. Cash BD, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;112(10):1617. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.256. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28978962 No abstract available.
  • Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
    Croteau R, Barkin JS. Croteau R, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;112(10):1616. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.249. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28978966 No abstract available.
  • Safety of Eluxadoline Use.
    Lai SW. Lai SW. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;114(7):1176-1177. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000205. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30920418 No abstract available.
  • Response to Lai.
    Cash BD, Lacy BE, Schoenfeld PS, Dove LS, Covington PS. Cash BD, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;114(7):1177-1178. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000312. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31205133 No abstract available.

References

    1. Chey WD, Kurlander J, Eswaran S. Irritable bowel syndrome: a clinical review. JAMA 2015;313:949–958. - PubMed
    1. Canavan C, West J, Card T. The epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Epidemiol 2014;6:71–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lovell RM, Ford AC. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:712–721. - PubMed
    1. Quigley EM, Abdel-Hamid H, Barbara G et al. A global perspective on irritable bowel syndrome: a consensus statement of the World Gastroenterology Organisation Summit Task Force on irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012;46:356–366. - PubMed
    1. Su AM, Shih W, Presson AP et al. Characterization of symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome with mixed bowel habit pattern. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;26:36–45. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms