Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 3;116(1):44-49.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.399. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening

Manon van der Vlugt  1 , Esmée J Grobbee  2 , Patrick Mm Bossuyt  3 , Evelien Bongers  4 , Wolfert Spijker  5 , Ernst J Kuipers  2 , Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar  6 , Marie-Louise Essink-Bot  7 , Manon C W Spaander  2 , Evelien Dekker  1
Affiliations

Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening

Manon van der Vlugt et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs is highly dependent on consistent participation over multiple rounds. We evaluated adherence to FIT screening over four rounds and aimed to identify determinants of participation behaviour.

Methods: A total of 23 339 randomly selected asymptomatic persons aged 50-74 years were invited for biennial FIT-based colorectal cancer screening between 2006 and 2014. All were invited for every consecutive round, except for those who had moved out of the area, passed the upper age limit, or had tested positive in a previous screening round. A reminder letter was sent to non-responders. We calculated participation rates per round, response rates to a reminder letter, and differences in participation between subgroups defined by age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES).

Results: Over the four rounds, participation rates increased significantly, from 60% (95% CI 60-61), 60% (95% CI 59-60), 62% (95% CI 61-63) to 63% (95% CI 62-64; P for trend<0.001) with significantly higher participation rates in women in all rounds (P<0.001). Of the 17 312 invitees eligible for at least two rounds of FIT screening, 12 455 (72%) participated at least once, whereas 4857 (28%) never participated; 8271 (48%) attended all rounds when eligible. Consistent participation was associated with older age, female sex, and higher SES. Offering a reminder letter after the initial invite in the first round increased uptake with 12%; in subsequent screening rounds this resulted in an additional uptake of up to 10%.

Conclusions: In four rounds of a pilot biennial FIT-screening program, we observed a consistently high and increasing participation rate, whereas sending reminders remain effective. The substantial proportion of inconsistent participants suggests the existence of incidental barriers to participation, which, if possible, should be identified and removed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall participation per screening round with percentage distribution of type of response to participation (initial response vs response after reminder letter).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participation rates per round of FIT-based screening subdivided by sex.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Allison JE, Sakoda LC, Levin TR, Tucker JP, Tekawa IS, Cuff T, Pauly MP, Shlager L, Palitz AM, Zhao WK, Schwartz JS, Ransohoff DF, Selby JV (2007) Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 99: 1462–1470. - PubMed
    1. Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Melillo S, Habarta N, Kalra GP, Chattopadhyay S, Wilson KM, Lee NC, Mullen PD, Coughlin SS, Briss PA Task Force on Community Preventive Services (2008) Client-Directed Interventions to Increase Community Demand for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Prev Med 35: S34–S55. - PubMed
    1. Crotta S, Segnan N, Paganin S, Dagnes B, Rosset R, Senore C (2012) High rate of advanced adenoma detection in 4 rounds of colorectal cancer screening with the fecal immunochemical test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10: 633–638. - PubMed
    1. Denis B, Gendre I, Perrin P (2015) Participation in four rounds of a French colorectal cancer screening programme with guaiac faecal occult blood test: a population-based open cohort study. J Med Screen 22: 76–82. - PubMed
    1. Denters MJ, Bossuyt PM, Deutekom M, Fockens P, Dekker E (2015) Most participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening out of curiosity about their chances of developing cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 24: 176–179. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms