Inpatient care of small and sick newborns in healthcare facilities
- PMID: 27924106
- PMCID: PMC5144116
- DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.186
Inpatient care of small and sick newborns in healthcare facilities
Abstract
Neonatal units in teaching and non-teaching hospitals both in public and private hospitals have been increasing in number in the country since the sixties. In 1994, a District Newborn Care Programme was introduced as a part of the Child Survival and Safe Motherhood Programme (CSSM) in 26 districts. Inpatient care of small and sick newborns in the public health system got a boost under National Rural Health Mission with the launch of the national programme on facility-based newborn care (FBNC). This has led to a nationwide creation of Newborn Care Corners (NBCC) at every point of child birth, newborn stabilization units (NBSUs) at First Referral Units (FRUs) and special newborn care units (SNCUs) at district hospitals. Guidelines and toolkits for standardized infrastructure, human resources and services at each level have been developed and a system of reporting data on FBNC created. Till March 2015, there were 565 SNCUs, 1904 NBSUs and 14 163 NBCCs operating in the country. There has been considerable progress in operationalizing SNCUs at the district hospitals; however establishing a network of SNCUs, NBSUs and NBCCs as a composite functional unit of newborn care continuum at the district level has lagged behind. NBSUs, the first point of referral for the sick newborn, have not received the desired attention and have remained a weak link in most districts. Other challenges include shortage of physicians, and hospital beds and absence of mechanisms for timely repair of equipment. With admission protocols not being adequately followed and a weak NBSU system, SNCUs are faced with the problem of admission overload and poor quality of care. Applying best practices of care at SNCUs, creating more NBSU linkages and strengthening NBCCs are important steps toward improving quality of FBNC. This can be further improved with regular monitoring and mentoring from experienced pediatricians, and nurses drawn from medical colleges and the private sector. In addition there is a need to further increase such units to address the unmet need of facility-based care.
Conflict of interest statement
Rajesh Khanna is affiliated to Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, India (sponsor of the supplement). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L et al. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet 2005; 365: 977–988. - PubMed
-
- Neogi SB, Malhotra S, Zodpey S, Mohan P. Does facility-based newborn care improve neonatal outcomes? A review of evidence. Indian Pediatr 2012; 49: 651–658. - PubMed
-
- Singh M, Paul V, Deorari A. The state of India's neonatal units in the mid-nineties. Indian Pediatr 1997; 34: 696–701. - PubMed
-
- Child Health Programme, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Child survival and safe motherhood (CSSM) programme. Available from: mohfw.nic.in/WriteReadData/l892s/6342515027file14.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2016).
-
- Ramji S, Modi M, Gupta N. 50 years of neonatology in India: progress and future. Indian Pediatr 2013; 50: 104–106. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
