Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep 22;11(1):e41-e49.
doi: 10.5301/heartint.5000230. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.

Atrial fibrillation management in older heart failure patients: a complex clinical problem

Affiliations
Review

Atrial fibrillation management in older heart failure patients: a complex clinical problem

Giovanni Pulignano et al. Heart Int. .

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), two problems of growing prevalence as a consequence of the ageing population, are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. AF and HF also share common risk factors and pathophysiologic processes such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and valvular heart disease often occur together. Although elderly patients with both HF and AF are affected by worse symptoms and poorer prognosis, there is a paucity of data on appropriate management of these patients.

Methods: PubMed was searched for studies on AF and older patients using the terms atrial fibrillation, elderly, heart failure, cognitive impairment, frailty, stroke, and anticoagulants.

Results: The clinical picture of HF patients with AF is complex and heterogeneous with a higher prevalence of frailty, cognitive impairment, and disability. Because of the association of mental and physical impairment to non-administration of oral anticoagulants (OACs), screening for these simple variables in clinical practice may allow better strategies for intervention in this high-risk population. Since novel direct OACs (NOACs) have a more favorable risk-benefit profile, they may be preferable to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in many frail elderly patients, especially those at higher risk of falls. Moreover, NOACs are simple to administer and monitor and may be associated with better adherence and safety in patients with cognitive deficits and mobility impairments.

Conclusions: Large multicenter longitudinal studies are needed to examine the effects of VKAs and NOACs on long-term cognitive function and frailty; future studies should include geriatric conditions.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Cognitive impairments; Elderly; Frailty; Heart failure; Oral anticoagulants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has financial interest related to this study to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1 -
Fig. 1 -
Common pathophysiological mechanisms and interactions between atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). LA = left atrium; MR = mitral regurgitation; TR = tricuspid regurgitation.
Fig. 2 -
Fig. 2 -
The effect of apixaban versus warfarin on major study outcomes according to age in the ARISTOTLE study. *Interaction p values are based on continuous age. Modified from (25): Halvorsen S, Atar D, Yang H, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin according to age for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: observations from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(28):1864-1872, by permission of Oxford University Press.
Fig. 3 -
Fig. 3 -
Primary efficacy outcome of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage in phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing a NOAC with vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation according to age. BID = twice daily; HR = hazard ratio; NOAC = novel direct oral anticoagulant; QD = once daily. Modified from (27): Best Pract Res Clin Haematol, Vol. 26, No. 2, Barco S, Cheung YW, Eikelboom JW, Coppens M. New oral anticoagulants in elderly patients, pp. 215-224, Copyright (2013), with permission from Elsevier.

References

    1. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285(18):2370–2375. - PubMed
    1. Zoni-Berisso M, Filippi A, Landolina M et al. Frequency, patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and resource usage of atrial fibrillation (from the Italian Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Management [ISAF] study). Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(5):705–711. - PubMed
    1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983–988. - PubMed
    1. Petty GW, Brown RD, Jr, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Ischemic stroke subtypes : a population-based study of functional outcome, survival, and recurrence. Stroke. 2000;31(5):1062–1068. - PubMed
    1. Mountantonakis SE, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Bhatt DL, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Fonarow GC. Presence of atrial fibrillation is independently associated with adverse outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure: an analysis of get with the guidelines-heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5(2):191–201. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources