Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 8:6:38632.
doi: 10.1038/srep38632.

Identification of a CD133-CD55- population functions as a fetal common skeletal progenitor

Affiliations

Identification of a CD133-CD55- population functions as a fetal common skeletal progenitor

Lihong Weng et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In this study, we identified a CD105+CD90.1-CD133-CD55- (CD133-CD55-) population in the fetal skeletal element that can generate bone and bone marrow. Besides osteoblasts and chondrocytes, the CD133-CD55- common progenitors can give rise to marrow reticular stromal cells and perivascular mesenchymal progenitors suggesting they function as the fetal common skeletal progenitor. Suppression of CXCL12 and Kitl expression in CD133-CD55- common progenitors severely disrupted the BM niche formation but not bone generation. Thus, CD133-CD55- common progenitors are the main source of CXCL12 and Kitl producing cells in the developing marrow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Expression of CD133 and CD55 in fetal skeletal progenitor.
(A) Representative FACS profiles of E15.5 fetal skeletal cells. They were separated based on CD105 and CD90.1 expression into fetal osteochondral progenitors (CD105+CD90.1−) and osteoprogenitors (CD105+CD90.1+). (B) The expression of CD133 and CD55 in CD105+CD90.1− and CD105+CD90.1+ populations determined by FACS analysis. (C) The gene expression of CD133 and CD55 in CD105+CD90.1− and CD105+CD90.1+ populations. (D,H) Representative FACS profiles of CD133 and CD55 in CD105+CD90.1− (D) and CD105+CD90.1+ (H) populations. (E,I) Distribution of CD133−CD55−, CD133+CD55− and CD133+CD55+ subpopulations in CD105+CD90.1− (E) and CD105+CD90.1+ (I) populations. (F,J) Representative FACS analysis of 6C3 expression in CD105+CD90.1− (F) and CD105+CD90.1+ (J) derived CD133−CD55−, CD133+CD55− and CD133+CD55+ subpopulations. (G,K) Distribution of 6C3 positive cells in CD105+CD90.1− (G) and CD105+CD90.1+ (K) derived CD133−CD55−, CD133+CD55− and CD133+CD55+ subpopulations. (n = 3 for each group. *p < 0.05, **P < 0.010).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Only CD105+CD90.1−CD133−CD55− fetal progenitors generated both osteoblast and chondrocyte in vitro.
Fetal CD105+CD90.1− osteochondral progenitors were further sorted based on CD133 and CD55 expression and cultured for one month. (A–C) Bright-field image of cultured CD133−CD55− (A), CD133+CD55− (B) and CD133+CD55+ (C) progenitors. Only CD133−CD55− cell formed both the chondrocytes cluster and osteoblast. (D) Upper panels: The cultured CD133−CD55− cells were stained for the expression of Col2 (red) and osteocalcin (green). Lower panels: A representative chondrocyte cluster (red). (E) Summary of single cell colony forming assay of the three fetal skeletal progenitors. (F–H) Representative images of the colonies derived from cultured single cell of CD133−CD55− (F), CD133+CD55− (G) and CD133+CD55+ (H) progenitors. (I) Representative FACS profiles of CD133−CD55− cells 2, 4, 6 and 7 days in culture.
Figure 3
Figure 3. CD133−CD55− fetal progenitors contributed to ectopic bone and marrow formation in vivo.
(A) Upper panel: Brightfield images of KC grafts from three sorted fetal progenitors 1 month after transplantation. Lower panel: Hematoxylin-and-Eosin (H.E) stained sections of KC grafts. (B) Brightfield (left) and GFP (middle) images of GFP-labeled CD133−CD55− progenitors one month after transplant. GFP image of the KC graft section (right). The KC graft was marked between the two dash lines. Marrow (BM) was located in the center. (C) GFP image of GFP-labeled CD133−CD55− progenitor KC graft (Far left). Images of the KC graft section in GFP(mid-left), GFP+dim light (mid-right). H.E staining of the slide after fluorescence images were captured (far right). (D) iCys scanning of the KC graft (left) and higher magnification of ectopic bone (middle, white square) and marrow (right, green square). P, periosteum; B, bone; V, vasculature; S, sinusoid; E, endosteum; BM, bone marrow.
Figure 4
Figure 4. CD133−CD55− common progenitors contributed to perivascular cells but not vasculature in vivo.
(A–C) iCys scanning of KC graft sections derived from GFP labeled CD133−CD55− progenitor. The sections were stained with antibodies against CD31(A), αSMA (B) or CD140a (C). Arrows indicate locations of donor-derived green cells. (D) Representative FACS analysis of CD140a expression in GFP+ graft cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5. CD133−CD55− common progenitors generated ectopic BM niche through endochondral differentiation.
KC grafts derived from CD133−CD55− progenitors were harvested at time indicated after transplantation. (A) Representative brightfield images (upper panel) and pentachrome stained sections (middle panel; yellow = osteoid, blue = cartilage) of KC grafts. The sections of adult limb bone and kidney were shown as control (lower panel). (B) Time course study of hematopoietic components during ectopic niche formation. Representative FACS profiles of HSC (CD45+Lineage-c-Kit+Sca1+) frequency that were pre-gated for live, CD45+lineage- cells.
Figure 6
Figure 6. CD133−CD55− common progenitors differentiated into Sca1+ mesenchyme cells in ectopic BM niche.
(A) Representative iCys scanned section of the KC graft derived from GFP labeled CD133−CD55− progenitor was stained with antibody against Sca1. Cells expressing both GFP and Sca1 were indicated by triangles, stars and arrows. The triangles label cells located in endosteum. The stars label the cells in perivascular regions. The arrows label the cells in stromal regions. (B) The expression of Sca1 in CD133−CD55− common progenitors determined by FACS analysis. (C) Representative brightfield (upper) and H.E section of the KC graft of sorted CD133−CD55−Sca1− cells one month after transplantation. Arrows indicate ectopic bones; star indicates the bone marrow. (D) GFP image of KC graft derived from GFP labeled CD133−CD55−Sca1− cells. (E) Representative FACS analysis of Sca−1 expression in GFP+ graft cells. (F) Section of GFP+ KC graft stained with Sca1. Arrows indicate the cells expressing both GFP and Sca−1. Blue dot line outlines the KC graft.
Figure 7
Figure 7. CXCL12 and Kitl play an important role in ectopic BM niche formation.
(A,B) Representative images of sections from GFP labeled CD133−CD55− progenitors derived KC grafts stained with antibody against CXCL12 (A) or Kitl (B). Cells expressing both GFP and CXCL12 (A) or GFP and Kitl (B) were indicated by triangles, stars and arrows. The triangles label cells located in endosteum. The stars label the cells in perivascular regions. The arrows label the cells in stromal regions. (C) Gene expression levels of CXCL12 and Kitl in freshly sorted CD133−CD55− progenitors and GFP+ donor derived cells harvested from KC grafts. (D) Knockdown efficiency of CXCL12 and Kitl was determined by qRT–PCR relative to scramble control. (E–H) Representative brightfield (E), GFP (F), GFP + dim brightfield (G) and H.E section (H) images of KC grafts derived from common progenitors transduced with lentivirus carried CXCL12 knockdown (left), Kitl knockdown (middle) or scramble control (right) constructs. Arrows indicate the vasculatures (only presented in the scramble control). (I,J) Representative FACS analysis of LSK (I; CD45+Lineage-c-Kit+Sca1+) and LT-HSC (J; LSKCD150+CD48−) frequency in KC grafts that were pre-gated for live, CD45+lineage− cells. The bone marrow and kidney cells were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ding L., Saunders T. L., Enikolopov G. & Morrison S. J. Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 481, 457–462, doi: 10.1038/nature10783 (2012). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Omatsu Y. et al.. The essential functions of adipo-osteogenic progenitors as the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell niche. Immunity 33, 387–399, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.017 (2010). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenbaum A. et al.. CXCL12 in early mesenchymal progenitors is required for haematopoietic stem-cell maintenance. Nature 495, 227–230, doi: 10.1038/nature11926 (2013). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ding L. & Morrison S. J. Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches. Nature 495, 231–235, doi: 10.1038/nature11885 (2013). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith-Berdan S. et al.. Robo4 cooperates with CXCR4 to specify hematopoietic stem cell localization to bone marrow niches. Cell stem cell 8, 72–83, doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.11.030 (2011). - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types