Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 8;17(6):421-428.
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6402.

Accuracy of automatic matching of Catphan 504 phantom in cone-beam computed tomography for tube current-exposure time product

Affiliations

Accuracy of automatic matching of Catphan 504 phantom in cone-beam computed tomography for tube current-exposure time product

Hui-Su Won et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of automatic matching in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images relative to the reduction of total tube current-exposure time product (mAs) for the X-ray imaging (XI) system. The CBCT images were acquired with the Catphan 504 phantom various total mAs ratios such as 1.00, 0.83, 0.67, 0.57, and 0.50. For studying the automatic match-ing accuracy, the phantom images were acquired with a six-dimensional shifting table. The image quality and correction of automatic matching were compared. With a decreasing total mAs ratio, the noise of the images increased and the low-contrast resolution decreased, while the accuracy of the automatic matching did not change. Therefore, this study shows that a change of the total mAs while acquiring CBCT images has no effect on the automatic matching of Catphan 504 phantom in XI system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
kV CBCT images of Catphan 504 phantom: (a) the sensitometry module, (b) the uniformity module, and (c) the low‐contrast module.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The mean values of the noises in the Catphan 504 with varying total mAs ratios.

References

    1. Sheets NC, Goldin GH, Meyer AM, et al. Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1611–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Los Santos J, Popple R, Agazaryan N, et al. Image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technologies for radiation therapy localization and delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(1):33–45. - PubMed
    1. Barriger RB, Forquer JA, Brabham JG, et al. A dose‐volume analysis of radiation pneumonitis in non‐small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(1):457–62. - PubMed
    1. Kestin L, Grills I, Guckenberger M, et al. Dose‐response relationship with clinical outcome for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered via online image guidance. Radiother Oncol. 2014;110(3):499–504. - PubMed
    1. Bloemen‐van Gurp E, van der Meer S, Hendry J, et al. Active breathing control in combination with ultrasound imaging: a feasibility study of image guidance in stereotactic body radiation therapy of liver lesions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85(4):1096–102. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources