Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;17(1):111.
doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0707-9. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

Headache service quality: evaluation of quality indicators in 14 specialist-care centres

Affiliations

Headache service quality: evaluation of quality indicators in 14 specialist-care centres

Sara Schramm et al. J Headache Pain. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The study was a collaboration between Lifting The Burden (LTB) and the European Headache Federation (EHF). Its aim was to evaluate the implementation of quality indicators for headache care Europe-wide in specialist headache centres (level-3 according to the EHF/LTB standard).

Methods: Employing previously-developed instruments in 14 such centres, we made enquiries, in each, of health-care providers (doctors, nurses, psychologists, physiotherapists) and 50 patients, and analysed the medical records of 50 other patients. Enquiries were in 9 domains: diagnostic accuracy, individualized management, referral pathways, patient's education and reassurance, convenience and comfort, patient's satisfaction, equity and efficiency of the headache care, outcome assessment and safety.

Results: Our study showed that highly experienced headache centres treated their patients in general very well. The centres were content with their work and their patients were content with their treatment. Including disability and quality-of-life evaluations in clinical assessments, and protocols regarding safety, proved problematic: better standards for these are needed. Some centres had problems with follow-up: many specialised centres operated in one-touch systems, without possibility of controlling long-term management or the success of treatments dependent on this.

Conclusions: This first Europe-wide quality study showed that the quality indicators were workable in specialist care. They demonstrated common trends, producing evidence of what is majority practice. They also uncovered deficits that might be remedied in order to improve quality. They offer the means of setting benchmarks against which service quality may be judged. The next step is to take the evaluation process into non-specialist care (EHF/LTB levels 1 and 2).

Keywords: Global campaign against headache; Headache care; Headache disorders; Service quality evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Buse DC, Sollars CM, Steiner TJ, Jensen RH, Al Jumah MA, Lipton RB. Why HURT? A review of clinical instruments for headache management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:237–254. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0263-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Headache Federation. Available at: http://ehf-org.org/. Accessed 25 Feb 2016.
    1. Katsarava Z, Gouveia RG, Jensen R, Gaul C, Schramm S, Schoppe A, Steiner TJ. Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres. J Headache Pain. 2015;16:537. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0537-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lifting The Burden. Available at: http://www.l-t-b.org/. Accessed 25 Feb 2016.
    1. Linde M, Gustavsson A, Stovner LJ, Steiner TJ, Barré J, Katsarava Z, Lainez JM, Lampl C, Lantéri-Minet M, Rastenyte D, Ruiz de la Torre E, Tassorelli C, Andrée C. The cost of headache disorders in Europe: the Eurolight project. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:703–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03612.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types