Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;33(4):10.1002/dmrr.2874.
doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2874. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

Comparing glucose and hemoglobin A1c diagnostic tests among a high metabolic risk Hispanic population

Affiliations

Comparing glucose and hemoglobin A1c diagnostic tests among a high metabolic risk Hispanic population

Mónica A Vega-Vázquez et al. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017 May.

Abstract

Background: Compare glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c ) diagnostic tests for prediabetes and diabetes with plasma glucose criteria and compare the metabolic profiles of people classified by HbA1c versus by glucose levels.

Methods: Participants were recruited for the San Juan Overweight Adults Longitudinal Study. The participants were primarily Hispanic (98%), without previously diagnosed diabetes, and aged 40 to 65 years. Participants classified as normal glycemic, prediabetes, or diabetes on the basis of baseline HbA1c and plasma glucose criteria were compared with respect to baseline cardiometabolic factors.

Results: The 1342 participants had a mean age of 50.5 ± 6.8 years and 28% were men. Thirty-one percent were diagnosed with prediabetes by plasma glucose criteria and 53.4% by HbA1c , and 8.1% were diagnosed with diabetes by plasma glucose criteria and 6.3% by HbA1c ; overall concordance rate was 55.1%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of HbA1c compared to plasma glucose criteria was 0.62 for impaired glucose and 0.76 for diabetes. A worse cardiometabolic profile was seen within subgroups that met HbA1c and plasma glucose criteria for diabetes or prediabetes. Those diagnosed with prediabetes by plasma glucose criteria had significantly higher systolic blood pressure and higher homeostatic model assessment than those diagnosed using HbA1c . Participants diagnosed with diabetes by plasma glucose criteria had lower body mass index, smaller waist circumference, and lower insulinogenic and disposition indices, but higher homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, than those diagnosed by HbA1c .

Conclusions: Low concordance was seen between HbA1c and glucose measurements. The HbA1c is not a good test for prediabetes but shows reasonable validity for diabetes in this high-risk predominantly female Hispanic population. People classified by HbA1c , plasma glucose criteria, or both show different metabolic profiles; a combined test may be ideal.

Keywords: HbA1c; IGT; diabetes; diagnosis; ethnicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pre-diabetes and Diabetes Prediction of HbA1c compared to OGTT
(a) ROC curve for pre-diabetes prediction of HbA1c compared to OGTT (b) ROC curve for pre-diabetes prediction of HbA1c compared to OGTT adjusted for age, gender and smoking, (c) ROC curve for diabetes prediction of HbA1c compared to OGTT (d) ROC curve for pre-diabetes prediction of HbA1c compared to OGTT adjusted for age, gender and smoking.

References

    1. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:S81–S90. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:S1–S94. - PubMed
    1. International Expert Commitee. International Expert Commitee Report on the Role of the A1C assay in the Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1327–1334. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global Prevalence of Diabetes: Estimates for the Year 2000 and Projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–1053. - PubMed
    1. Santos-Rey K, Fernandez-Riejos P, Mateo J, Sanchez-Margalet V, Goberna R. Glycated hemoglobin vs. the oral glucose tolerance test for the exclusion of impaired glucose tolerance in high risk individuals. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48:1719–1722. - PubMed