Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb;17(2):101-107.
doi: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1271326. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

Radical cystectomy: do we need standardization?

Affiliations
Review

Radical cystectomy: do we need standardization?

Christian Ladurner et al. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

The first series of radical cystectomy with a definition of surgical landmarks was published in 1949 and was characterized by a high perioperative mortality and a 5-year survival rate around 50%. Decades later, nevertheless many surgical progresses were made and the perioperative mortality dropped to 2,5%, this had not lead to an improvement of long term survival rates, also because a standardization of the procedure is still missing. Areas covered: Radical cystectomy is performed with different surgical techniques obmitting a standardization. The comparability of many studies is therefore difficult or havely compromised. A paragon with other diciplines was made emphazing that there high surgical quality is defined, measured and controlled. A systematic literature search was made selecting finally 76 article adressing this issue. Expert commentary: Surgical guidelines in uro-oncology are vague and a definition of surgical quality is missing. A view outside of the box could be very helpful. This is a plea for a change.

Keywords: Radical cystectomy; checklist; guidelines; lymph node dissection; prostate sparing cystectomy; standardization; surgical quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources