Using a computer simulation for teaching communication skills: A blinded multisite mixed methods randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 27939846
- PMCID: PMC5385273
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.024
Using a computer simulation for teaching communication skills: A blinded multisite mixed methods randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objectives: To assess advanced communication skills among second-year medical students exposed either to a computer simulation (MPathic-VR) featuring virtual humans, or to a multimedia computer-based learning module, and to understand each group's experiences and learning preferences.
Methods: A single-blinded, mixed methods, randomized, multisite trial compared MPathic-VR (N=210) to computer-based learning (N=211). Primary outcomes: communication scores during repeat interactions with MPathic-VR's intercultural and interprofessional communication scenarios and scores on a subsequent advanced communication skills objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare outcomes.
Secondary outcomes: student attitude surveys and qualitative assessments of their experiences with MPathic-VR or computer-based learning.
Results: MPathic-VR-trained students improved their intercultural and interprofessional communication performance between their first and second interactions with each scenario. They also achieved significantly higher composite scores on the OSCE than computer-based learning-trained students. Attitudes and experiences were more positive among students trained with MPathic-VR, who valued its providing immediate feedback, teaching nonverbal communication skills, and preparing them for emotion-charged patient encounters.
Conclusions: MPathic-VR was effective in training advanced communication skills and in enabling knowledge transfer into a more realistic clinical situation.
Practice implications: MPathic-VR's virtual human simulation offers an effective and engaging means of advanced communication training.
Keywords: Breaking bad news; Communication training; Computer simulation; Computer-based conversational agent; Cultural competence; Doctor-patient relationship; Healthcare communication; Human-computer interaction; Intelligent tutoring systems; Inter-professional communication; Intercultural communication; Knowledge transfer; Mindful practice; Mixed methods research; Nonverbal communication; Reflection in action; Reflection on action; Simulation; Training transfer; Virtual Human.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Frederick Kron serves as president and Michael Fetters has stock options in Medical Cyberworlds, Inc., the entity receiving SBIR II grant funds for this project—the University of Michigan Conflict of Interest Office considered potential for conflict of interest, and concluded that no formal management plan was required.
Figures
References
-
- Ong LM, De Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Social science & medicine. 1995;40(7):903–918. - PubMed
-
- Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Githens PB, Sloan FA. Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992;267(10):1359–1363. - PubMed
-
- Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Entman SS, Miller CS, Githens PB, Whetten-Goldstein K, Sloan FA. Obstetricians' prior malpractice experience and patients' satisfaction with care. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994;272(20):1583–1587. - PubMed
-
- Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277(7):553–559. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials