Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Feb:53:106-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

Randomized controlled dissemination study of community-to-clinic navigation to promote CRC screening: Study design and implications

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized controlled dissemination study of community-to-clinic navigation to promote CRC screening: Study design and implications

Linda Larkey et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Regular screening facilitates early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and reduction of CRC morbidity and mortality. Screening rates for minorities and low-income populations remain suboptimal. Provider referral for CRC screening is one of the strongest predictors of adherence, but referrals are unlikely among those who have no clinic home (common among poor and minority populations).

Methods/study design: This group randomized controlled study will test the effectiveness of an evidence based tailored messaging intervention in a community-to-clinic navigation context compared to no navigation. Multicultural, underinsured individuals from community sites will be randomized (by site) to receive CRC screening education only, or education plus navigation. In Phase I, those randomized to education plus navigation will be guided to make a clinic appointment to receive a provider referral for CRC screening. Patients attending clinic appointments will continue to receive navigation until screened (Phase II) regardless of initial arm assignment. We hypothesize that those receiving education plus navigation will be more likely to attend clinic appointments (H1) and show higher rates of screening (H2) compared to those receiving education only. Phase I group assignment will be used as a control variable in analysis of screening follow-through in Phase II. Costs per screening achieved will be evaluated for each condition and the RE-AIM framework will be used to examine dissemination results.

Conclusion: The novelty of our study design is the translational dissemination model that will allow us to assess the real-world application of an efficacious intervention previously tested in a randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow, sample size, and hypothesis testing.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) The colorectal progress review report. http://progressreport.cancer.gov/doc_detail.asp?pid=0&did=0&chid=72&coid... (Accessed February 1 2008)
    1. Richardson LC, Rim SH, Plescia M. Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50–75 years United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2010. 2008;59:1–4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http:www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5926a3.htm?s_cid=mm5926a3_w. Updated 2009. Accessed August, 31, 2010. - PubMed
    1. Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(2):389–394. - PubMed
    1. National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. 80% by 2018 Pledge. http://nccrt.org/tools/80-percent-by-2018/80-percent-by-2018-pledge/ (Accessed October 23, 2016)
    1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice (PAR-02-042) http://www.grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-02-042.2002 (Updated 2001. Accessed January 24, 2008)

Publication types