Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar 9;52(2):234-241.
doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agw091.

Assertive Community Treatment For People With Alcohol Dependence: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Colin Drummond  1 , Helen Gilburt  2   3 , Tom Burns  4 , Alex Copello  5 , Michael Crawford  6 , Ed Day  1 , Paolo Deluca  1 , Christine Godfrey  7 , Steve Parrott  7 , Abigail Rose  8 , Julia Sinclair  9 , Simon Coulton  10
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Assertive Community Treatment For People With Alcohol Dependence: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Colin Drummond et al. Alcohol Alcohol. .

Abstract

Aims: A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility and potential efficacy of assertive community treatment (ACT) in adults with alcohol dependence.

Methods: Single blind, individually randomized, pilot RCT of 12 months of ACT plus treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU alone in adults (age 18+ years) with alcohol dependence and a history of previous unsuccessful alcohol treatment attending specialist community alcohol treatment services. ACT aimed to actively engage participants for 12 months with assertive, regular, minimum weekly contact. ACT was combined with TAU. TAU comprised access to the full range of services provided by the community teams. Primary outcome is mean drinks per drinking day and percent days abstinent at 12 months follow up. Analysis of covariance was conducted using 80% confidence intervals, appropriate in the context of a pilot trial.

Results: A total of 94 participants were randomized, 45 in ACT and 49 in TAU. Follow-up was achieved with 98 and 88%, respectively at 12 months. Those in ACT had better treatment engagement, and were more often seen in their homes or local community than TAU participants. At 12 months the ACT group had more problems related to drinking and lower quality of life than TAU but no differences in drinking measures. The ACT group had a higher percentage of days abstinent but lower quality of life at 6 months. The ACT group had less unplanned healthcare use than TAU.

Conclusions: An trial of ACT was feasible to implement in an alcohol dependent treatment population.

Trial registration: ISRCTN22775534.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Trial consort diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Burns T, Fiander M, Kent A, et al. (2000) Effects of case-load size on the process of care of patients with severe psychotic illness. Br J Psychiatry 177:427–433. - PubMed
    1. Dieterich M, Irving CB, Park B, et al. (2010) Intensive case management for severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department of Health (2007) Drug Misuse and Dependence: UK Guidelines on Clinical Management. London: Department of Health (England), the Scottish Government, Welsh Assembly Government and Northern Ireland Executive.
    1. Drummond C. (1990) The relationship between alcohol dependence and alcohol related problems in a clinical population. Br J Addict 85:357–366. - PubMed
    1. Drummond C, Coulton S, James D, et al. (2009) Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of stepped care intervention for alcohol use disorders in primary care: a pilot study. B J Psychiatry 195:448–456. - PubMed

Publication types