Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec 8;5(4):51.
doi: 10.3390/biology5040051.

Anaphase B

Affiliations
Review

Anaphase B

Jonathan M Scholey et al. Biology (Basel). .

Abstract

Anaphase B spindle elongation is characterized by the sliding apart of overlapping antiparallel interpolar (ip) microtubules (MTs) as the two opposite spindle poles separate, pulling along disjoined sister chromatids, thereby contributing to chromosome segregation and the propagation of all cellular life. The major biochemical "modules" that cooperate to mediate pole-pole separation include: (i) midzone pushing or (ii) braking by MT crosslinkers, such as kinesin-5 motors, which facilitate or restrict the outward sliding of antiparallel interpolar MTs (ipMTs); (iii) cortical pulling by disassembling astral MTs (aMTs) and/or dynein motors that pull aMTs outwards; (iv) ipMT plus end dynamics, notably net polymerization; and (v) ipMT minus end depolymerization manifest as poleward flux. The differential combination of these modules in different cell types produces diversity in the anaphase B mechanism. Combinations of antagonist modules can create a force balance that maintains the dynamic pre-anaphase B spindle at constant length. Tipping such a force balance at anaphase B onset can initiate and control the rate of spindle elongation. The activities of the basic motor filament components of the anaphase B machinery are controlled by a network of non-motor MT-associated proteins (MAPs), for example the key MT cross-linker, Ase1p/PRC1, and various cell-cycle kinases, phosphatases, and proteases. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms of anaphase B spindle elongation in eukaryotic cells and briefly mentions bacterial DNA segregation systems that operate by spindle elongation.

Keywords: anaphase B; mitotic motors; poleward flux; spindle elongation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Basic structure of the anaphase B spindle. The major components driving anaphase B spindle elongation are shown, namely ipMTs and the spindle midzone as well as aMTs and the cell cortex, and the structural polarity of spindle MTs is indicated by marking their plus ends. For simplicity, branched augmin-nucleated and chromatin-nucleated MTs that do not reach the poles, as well as pole-nucleated MTs that do not reach kinetochores or the midzone, are not included. Also, anastral spindles lacking centrosomes at the poles are not represented here.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Anaphase B in an idealized and simplified mitotic spindle. The spindle is depicted (a) during metaphase-anaphase A (aka pre-anaphase B), when poleward flux is “on” maintaining the spindle at a constant length, S1; (b) at the start of anaphase B, when flux is turned off so that the spindle can begin to elongate; and (c) at late anaphase, when the spindle has completed its elongation to length S2. The major biochemical modules are shown, namely midzone (i) pushing or (ii) braking by MT crosslinkers, particularly kinesin-5 motors and Ase1p MAPs; (iii) cortical pulling by depolymerizing proteins and/or dynein motors attached to the cortex that respectively disassemble or translocate along aMTs to pull them and the attached poles outward; (iv) ipMT plus end dynamics, notably net polymerization; and (v) ipMT minus end depolymerization manifest as poleward flux. In most cells anaphase B starts after anaphase A (as depicted here), but there are exceptions, e.g., in mouse eggs anaphase B precedes anaphase A [42]. Unless otherwise indicated, in this and all other figures, arrows depict direction of movement of ipMTs and aMTs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Electron microscopic analysis of anaphase B spindle elongation in budding yeast mitotic spindles showing the structural reorganization of ipMT bundles. 3D reconstructions of (A) short spindle; (B) early elongating; and (C) late elongating spindle. Sample cross sections taken at points indicated by arrows are shown for each reconstruction. In (B) kMTs have mostly depolymerized; in (C) they have completely depolymerized. Scale bar: 0.1 μm (Originally published as Figure 4 in reference [32], used with permission).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Anaphase B spindle in a Drosophila embryo. The upper drawing of the anaphase B spindle has a pole–pole axis corresponding with that of the drawing below showing the relative distribution of kinesin-5 motors, Ase1p crosslinkers, and the plus end binding protein Eb1 along the spindle (adapted from [93]).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Anaphase B modules. The five biochemical modules depicted in Figure 2 (modules i–v) that are deployed to various extents in different systems are shown in more detail.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Anaphase B spindle design in different systems. The simplified drawings depict spindles from (a) diatoms; (b) budding yeast; (c) the rust fungus Ustilago; (d) early C. elegans embryos; (e) Drosophila syncytial embryos; (f) vertebrate cultured cells; and (g) bacterial cells. Not drawn to scale.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Theoretical models of anaphase B. Three of the models discussed in the text are drawn here, namely (a) the slide and flux-or-elongate (SAFE) model; (b) the slide-and-cluster (SAC) model; and (c) the cell-size dependent spindle elongation model. ((a) and (b) are based on [199] and (c) is based on [192].)

References

    1. McIntosh J.R., Molodtsov M.I., Ataullakhanov F.I. Biophysics of mitosis. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2012;45:147–207. doi: 10.1017/S0033583512000017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walczak C.E., Cai S., Khodjakov A. Mechanisms of chromosome behaviour during mitosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;11:91–102. doi: 10.1038/nrm2832. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goshima G., Scholey J.M. Control of mitotic spindle length. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010;26:21–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maiato H., Lince-Faria M. The perpetual movements of anaphase. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010;67:2251–2269. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0327-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gadde S., Heald R. Mechanisms and molecules of the mitotic spindle. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:R797–R805. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.021. - DOI - PubMed