Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec 1:11:6421-6433.
doi: 10.2147/IJN.S121238. eCollection 2016.

Nanotoxicity: emerging concerns regarding nanomaterial safety and occupational hard metal (WC-Co) nanoparticle exposure

Affiliations
Review

Nanotoxicity: emerging concerns regarding nanomaterial safety and occupational hard metal (WC-Co) nanoparticle exposure

Andrea L Armstead et al. Int J Nanomedicine. .

Abstract

As the number of commercial and consumer products containing engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) continually rises, the increased use and production of these ENMs presents an important toxicological concern. Although ENMs offer a number of advantages over traditional materials, their extremely small size and associated characteristics may also greatly enhance their toxic potentials. ENM exposure can occur in various consumer and industrial settings through inhalation, ingestion, or dermal routes. Although the importance of accurate ENM characterization, effective dosage metrics, and selection of appropriate cell or animal-based models are universally agreed upon as important factors in ENM research, at present, there is no "standardized" approach used to assess ENM toxicity in the research community. Of particular interest is occupational exposure to tungsten carbide cobalt (WC-Co) "dusts," composed of nano- and micro-sized particles, in hard metal manufacturing facilities and mining and drilling industries. Inhalation of WC-Co dust is known to cause "hard metal lung disease" and an increased risk of lung cancer; however, the mechanisms underlying WC-Co toxicity, the inflammatory disease state and progression to cancer are poorly understood. Herein, a discussion of ENM toxicity is followed by a review of the known literature regarding the effects of WC-Co particle exposure. The risk of WC-Co exposure in occupational settings and the updates of in vitro and in vivo studies of both micro- and nano-WC-Co particles are discussed.

Keywords: cancer; engineered nanomaterial; lung disease; occupational exposure; particle; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Routes and potential detrimental effects of nanoparticle exposure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cell viability after (A) nano-WC-Co and (B) micro-WC-Co particle exposure and (C) oxidative stress indicated by DCF fluorescence after exposure to 1,000 μg/mL nano- and micro-WC-Co particles. *P<0.05, #P<0.001 compared to control, P<0.05 compared to micro-WC-Co. Note: Reproduced from Armstead AL, Arena CB, Li B. Exploring the potential role of tungsten carbide cobalt (WC-Co) nanoparticle internalization in observed toxicity toward lung epithelial cells in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014;278(1):1–8. Abbreviations: DCF, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein; WC-Co, tungsten carbide cobalt.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pulmonary inflammation parameters assessed in the BAL fluid following 24 h exposure to WC-Co and CeO2 NPs: (A) LDH activity, (B) albumin, and (C) AM chemiluminescence. Values presented as mean ± SD. *P<0.05, P<0.001 compared to the vehicle control, and #P<0.01 compared to WC-Co NP exposed groups. Notes: Reproduced from Armstead AL, Minarchick VC, Porter DW, Nurkiewicz TR, Li B. Acute inflammatory responses of nanoparticles in an intra-tracheal instillation rat model. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118778. Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AM, alveolar macrophage; SD, standard deviation; NP, nanoparticle; WC-Co, tungsten carbide cobalt.

References

    1. Schrand AM, Dai L, Schlager JJ, Hussain SM. Toxicity testing of nanomaterials. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;745:58–75. - PubMed
    1. Hansen SF, Baun A, Michelson ES, Kamper A, Borling P, Stuer-Lauridsen F. Nanomaterials in consumer products: categorization and exposure assessment. In: Linkov I, Steevens J, editors. Nanomate rials: Risks and Benefits. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; 2009. pp. 359–367.
    1. Stamm H, Gibson N, Anklam E. Detection of nanomaterials in food and consumer products: bridging the gap from legislation to enforcement. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2012;29(8):1175–1182. - PubMed
    1. de Silva MN. Nanotechnology and nanomedicine: a new horizon for medical diagnostics and treatment. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007;82(6):331–334. - PubMed
    1. Wang Q, Yan J, Yang J, Li B. Nanomaterials promise better bone repair. Mater Today. 2016;19(8):451–463.

MeSH terms