Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Mar;49(3):525-532.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1473-y. Epub 2016 Dec 10.

Comparison of multiple fluid status assessment methods in patients on chronic hemodialysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of multiple fluid status assessment methods in patients on chronic hemodialysis

Giannis Alexiadis et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Control of hydration status is an important constituent of adequate and efficient hemodialysis (HD) treatment. Nevertheless, there are no precise clinical indices for early recognition of small changes in fluid status of patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis therapy. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the widely used and reliable method of indexed inferior vena cava diameter (IVCDi) with established and more recently available techniques (bioelectrical impedance analysis [BIA], continuous blood volume monitoring [Crit-line], and the B-line score [BLS] with lung ultrasonography) for estimating the hydration status of patients on HD.

Methods: Fifty-three patients undergoing chronic HD thrice weekly were included in the study. Evaluation of hydration status methods (IVCDi, BLS, BIA, and Crit-line) was performed thrice weekly before and after HD. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the discriminative power of (methods) the BLS, BIA, and Crit-line for predicting over- and underhydration of patients, as determined by the reference method, IVCDi.

Results: BLS showed the most promising results in predicting overhydration, as determined by IVCDi, compared with BIA and Crit-line and presented a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 74%. The accuracy of the BLS was higher than that of BIA (0.81 vs. 0.71, p = 0.032) and Crit-line (0.61, p = 0.001). BLS also showed more promising results in predicting underhydration, as determined by IVCDi, than BIA and Crit-line and presented a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 73%. The accuracy of the BLS was higher than that of BIA (0.83 vs. 0.76, p = 0.035) and Crit-line (0.50, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The BLS is a useful and easily performed technique that has recently become available for accurate evaluation of dry weight and fluid status in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing chronic HD. This method might help recognize asymptomatic lung congestion in these patients.

Keywords: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA); Crit-line; Dry weight; Fluid assessment; Hemodialysis patient; Indexed inferior vena cava diameter (IVCDi); Ultrasound lung comets/B-line score (BLS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blood Purif. 2001;19(1):33-8 - PubMed
    1. Kidney Int. 2004 Jun;65(6):2435-40 - PubMed
    1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 May;17(5):1481-7 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Sep;30(9):1834-7 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 2009 Apr;135(4):1050-1060 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources