Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Sep;52(2):181-91.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-181.

Effectiveness and persistence of precurrent mediating behavior in delayed matching to sample and oddity matching with children

Affiliations

Effectiveness and persistence of precurrent mediating behavior in delayed matching to sample and oddity matching with children

L J Torgrud et al. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Sep.

Abstract

Two kinds of mediating behavior were compared with respect to their effectiveness in variable-delay matching-to-sample and oddity-matching tasks. Each of four 5-year-old children was trained to emit either differential or common mediating responses. The differential mediating response consisted of pressing a specific computer key corresponding to either of two possible sample stimuli (a red or a green square). The common mediating response consisted of pressing one of the two response keys regardless of the sample. The differential-response subjects did not show the typical, delay-related decrease in matching-to-sample performance that characterized the behavior of common-response subjects. An oddity-matching task was then introduced, and subjects were instructed to use the mediating keys however they preferred, including not at all. Differential-response subjects continued to respond on the originally trained mediating keys in response to sample presentation and later reversed their choice responding, thus accommodating the oddity-matching requirements. Common-response subjects continued to emit the previously trained mediating response and experienced limited success in oddity matching. Results were interpreted in terms of stimulus control, instructional control, and experimental history.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):327-33 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Fall;19(3):283-8 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jan;33(1):39-49 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Apr;2:151-60 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):565-601 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources