Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli
- PMID: 2794868
Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli
Abstract
The transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned stimuli (CSs) and unconditioned stimuli (USs) was examined in four experiments that used Pavlovian appetitive feature negative discrimination training procedures with rats. After training with simultaneous compounds (A+, XA-), X inhibited conditioned responding (CRs) elicited by other CSs and CRs supported by other appetitive USs that had not been involved in discrimination training. After training with serial compounds (A+, X----A-), X's power to set the occasion for nonresponding transferred across CSs and USs only if those events had also been involved in serial feature negative discrimination training. The results supported the suggestion that the acquisition of negative occasion setting involves the representation of individual events in a higher order memory system, separate from that involved in simple association, and that negative occasion setters act only on events that are represented in that system.
Similar articles
-
Transfer across unconditioned stimuli in serial feature discrimination training.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Jan;28(1):83-96. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002. PMID: 11868237
-
Occasion-setting training renders stimuli more similar: acquired equivalence between the targets of feature-positive discriminations.Q J Exp Psychol B. 1994 Feb;47(1):63-81. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1994. PMID: 8165326
-
Differential effects of reinforcement of an inhibitory feature after serial and simultaneous feature negative discrimination training.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Oct;10(4):461-75. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984. PMID: 6491607
-
Occasion setting, inhibition, and the contextual control of extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental (operant) learning.Behav Processes. 2017 Apr;137:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 6. Behav Processes. 2017. PMID: 27720958 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reinstatement after human feature-positive discrimination learning.Behav Processes. 2017 Apr;137:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 17. Behav Processes. 2017. PMID: 28108345 Review.
Cited by
-
Inhibition in discriminated operant learning: Tests of response-specificity after feature-negative and extinction learning.J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Oct;48(4):413-434. doi: 10.1037/xan0000337. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022. PMID: 36265027 Free PMC article.
-
Transfer of directed-forgetting cues across discrimination tasks with pigeons.Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1005-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03206435. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005. PMID: 16615320
-
On the differences in degree of renewal produced by the different renewal designs.Behav Processes. 2013 Oct;99:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Jul 17. Behav Processes. 2013. PMID: 23872501 Free PMC article.
-
Saliency determines the integration of contextual information into stimulus-response episodes.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 May;84(4):1264-1285. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02428-5. Epub 2022 Jan 19. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022. PMID: 35048312 Free PMC article.
-
Extinction of a Pavlovian-conditioned inhibitor leads to stimulus-specific inhibition.Learn Behav. 2020 Jun;48(2):234-245. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00396-3. Learn Behav. 2020. PMID: 31721098 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources