Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;24(5):264-268.
doi: 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000010.

Measurement of outcomes for patients with centralising versus non-centralising neck pain

Affiliations

Measurement of outcomes for patients with centralising versus non-centralising neck pain

Terrence Rose et al. J Man Manip Ther. 2016 Dec.

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Man Manip Ther. 2017 Feb;25(1):62. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2017.1279438. Epub 2017 Jan 9. J Man Manip Ther. 2017. PMID: 28855794 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine whether individuals with neck pain who demonstrate centralisation of symptoms have more favourable outcome than individuals who do not demonstrate centralisation.

Methods: Eleven subjects with neck pain were evaluated and treated by two physical therapists certified in Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT). Eleven physical therapy patients underwent a routine initial evaluation and were treated 2-3 times per week using MDT principles and other physical therapy interventions. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) tool was administered at the initial examination, approximately 2 weeks following the initial examination, each subsequent re-evaluation, and at discharge from the study to measure changes in functional outcomes for each subject. Patients continued with treatments until they were discharged or removed from the study. Four subjects were referred back to their physician by treating physical therapist secondary to non-centralisation (NC) and worsening of symptoms.

Results: Of the 11 subjects, six demonstrated centralisation (CEN) and five demonstrated NC. At initial evaluation, the average NDI score for the CEN group was 51.0 (SD ± 19.4) and 56.4 (SD ± 17.6) for the NC group. For the CEN group, the average change in NDI score between initial evaluation and discharge was 41.2 (SD ± 13.2 and 12.2 (SD ± 13.0) for the NC group. The correlation coefficient of CEN and change in NDI score was 0.772 and was statistically significant (P = 0.005).

Conclusions: In this limited sample, people with neck pain demonstrated more favourable outcomes when the CEN phenomenon was observed. Future research on CEN should be investigated with a larger sample size and with a greater number of clinicians trained in the MDT approach.

Keywords: Centralisation; Cervical radiculopathy; MDT; NDI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Difference in change of NDI score between the non-centralisation (NC) and centralisation (CEN) groups. Note: 0: NC; 1: CEN; NDI: Neck Disability Index.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boissonnault WG, Badke M. Influence of acuity on physical therapy outcomes for patients with cervical disorder. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:81–6. - PubMed
    1. Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J. 2009;9:802–8. - PubMed
    1. Dionne CP, Bybee RF, Tomaka J. Inter-rater reliability of McKenzie assessment in patients with neck pain. Physiother. 2006;92:75–82.
    1. Binder AI. Cervical spondylosis and neck pain. BMJ. 2007;334:527–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarig-Bahat H. Evidence for exercise therapy in mechanical neck disorders. Man Ther. 2003;8:10–20. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources