Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts
- PMID: 27959712
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts
Abstract
Background: The use of bilateral internal thoracic (mammary) arteries for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) may improve long-term outcomes as compared with the use of a single internal-thoracic-artery plus vein grafts.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients scheduled for CABG to undergo single or bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting in 28 cardiac surgical centers in seven countries. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 10 years. The composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke was a secondary outcome. Interim analyses were prespecified at 5 years of follow-up.
Results: A total of 3102 patients were enrolled; 1554 were randomly assigned to undergo single internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the single-graft group) and 1548 to undergo bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the bilateral-graft group). At 5 years of follow-up, the rate of death was 8.7% in the bilateral-graft group and 8.4% in the single-graft group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.32; P=0.77), and the rate of the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke was 12.2% and 12.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.17; P=0.69). The rate of sternal wound complication was 3.5% in the bilateral-graft group versus 1.9% in the single-graft group (P=0.005), and the rate of sternal reconstruction was 1.9% versus 0.6% (P=0.002).
Conclusions: Among patients undergoing CABG, there was no significant difference between those receiving single internal-thoracic-artery grafts and those receiving bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafts with regard to mortality or the rates of cardiovascular events at 5 years of follow-up. There were more sternal wound complications with bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting than with single internal-thoracic-artery grafting. Ten-year follow-up is ongoing. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation and others; ART Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN46552265 .).
Comment in
-
Surgery: Single vs bilateral artery grafts.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Jan;14(1):4. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.193. Epub 2016 Nov 24. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 27883005 No abstract available.
-
Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):e37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1703358. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28471630 No abstract available.
-
Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):e37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1703358. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28471631 No abstract available.
-
Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):e37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1703358. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28471632 No abstract available.
-
Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):e37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1703358. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28471633 No abstract available.
-
Sternal wound management after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: a significant detail.Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jun;5(12):262. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.84. Ann Transl Med. 2017. PMID: 28706930 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Lessons from the arterial revascularization trial.Ann Transl Med. 2017 Aug;5(15):314. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.04.07. Ann Transl Med. 2017. PMID: 28856154 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical