Data extraction for complex meta-analysis (DECiMAL) guide
- PMID: 27964742
- PMCID: PMC5154138
- DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0368-4
Data extraction for complex meta-analysis (DECiMAL) guide
Abstract
As more complex meta-analytical techniques such as network and multivariate meta-analyses become increasingly common, further pressures are placed on reviewers to extract data in a systematic and consistent manner. Failing to do this appropriately wastes time, resources and jeopardises accuracy. This guide (data extraction for complex meta-analysis (DECiMAL)) suggests a number of points to consider when collecting data, primarily aimed at systematic reviewers preparing data for meta-analysis. Network meta-analysis (NMA), multiple outcomes analysis and analysis combining different types of data are considered in a manner that can be useful across a range of data collection programmes. The guide has been shown to be both easy to learn and useful in a small pilot study.
Keywords: Analysis; Data; Extraction; Guide; Meta-analysis; Multivariate; Network; Review.
References
-
- Brooke J. SUS—a quick and dirty usability scale. 1986. http://www.usabilitynet.org/trump/documents/Suschapt.doc. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.
-
- Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). Data collection form. EPOC Resources for review authors. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. 2013. http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-specific-resources-review-authors. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials