Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 28:7:1875.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01875. eCollection 2016.

Personalized Behavioral Feedback for Online Gamblers: A Real World Empirical Study

Affiliations

Personalized Behavioral Feedback for Online Gamblers: A Real World Empirical Study

Michael M Auer et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Responsible gambling tools (e.g., limit-setting tools, pop-up messages, and personalized feedback) have become increasingly popular as a way of facilitating players to gamble in a more responsible manner. However, relatively few studies have evaluated whether such tools actually work. The present study examined whether the use of three types of information (i.e., personalized feedback, normative feedback, and/or a recommendation) could enable players to gamble more responsibly as assessed using three measures of gambling behavior, i.e., theoretical loss (TL), amount of money wagered, and gross gaming revenue (GGR) (i.e., net win/loss). By manipulating the three forms of information, data from six different groups of players were analyzed. The participant sample drawn from the population were those that had played at least one game for money on the Norsk Tipping online platform (Instaspill) during April 2015. A total of 17,452 players were randomly selected from 69,631 players that fulfilled the selection criteria. Of these, 5,528 players participated in the experiment. Gambling activity among the control group (who received no personalized feedback, normative feedback or no recommendation) was also compared with the other five groups that received information of some kind (personalized feedback, normative feedback and/or a recommendation). Compared to the control group, all groups that received some kind of messaging significantly reduced their gambling behavior as assessed by TL, amount of money wagered, and GGR. The results support the hypothesis that personalized behavioral feedback can enable behavioral change in gambling but that normative feedback does not appear change behavior significantly more than personalized feedback.

Keywords: behavioral feedback; human–computer interaction; online gambling; persuasive communication; problem gambling; responsible gambling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Line chart containing personalized feedback of money lost (in NOK).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Line chart containing personalized feedback of money lost (in NOK) compared to other players’ losses (i.e., normative feedback).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Median 7-day change of theoretical loss variable by experimental group.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Median 7-day change of theoretical loss variable by experimental group for 1st-week responders.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ajzen I. (1985). “From intentions to action: a theory of planned behavior,” in Action Control: from Cognitions to Behaviors eds Kuhl J., Beckman J. (New York, NY: Springer; ) 11–39.
    1. Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2013). Voluntary limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: an empirical study of gambling behaviour. J. Gambl. Stud. 29 647–660. - PubMed
    1. Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2014). An empirical investigation of theoretical loss and gambling intensity. J. Gambl. Stud. 30 879–887. 10.1007/s10899-013-9376-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2015a). Testing normative and self-appraisal feedback in an online slot-machine pop-up message in a real-world setting. Front. Psychol. 6:339 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00339 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2015b). The use of personalized behavioral feedback for online gamblers: an empirical study. Front. Psychol. 6:1406 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01406 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources