Personalized Behavioral Feedback for Online Gamblers: A Real World Empirical Study
- PMID: 27965611
- PMCID: PMC5124696
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01875
Personalized Behavioral Feedback for Online Gamblers: A Real World Empirical Study
Abstract
Responsible gambling tools (e.g., limit-setting tools, pop-up messages, and personalized feedback) have become increasingly popular as a way of facilitating players to gamble in a more responsible manner. However, relatively few studies have evaluated whether such tools actually work. The present study examined whether the use of three types of information (i.e., personalized feedback, normative feedback, and/or a recommendation) could enable players to gamble more responsibly as assessed using three measures of gambling behavior, i.e., theoretical loss (TL), amount of money wagered, and gross gaming revenue (GGR) (i.e., net win/loss). By manipulating the three forms of information, data from six different groups of players were analyzed. The participant sample drawn from the population were those that had played at least one game for money on the Norsk Tipping online platform (Instaspill) during April 2015. A total of 17,452 players were randomly selected from 69,631 players that fulfilled the selection criteria. Of these, 5,528 players participated in the experiment. Gambling activity among the control group (who received no personalized feedback, normative feedback or no recommendation) was also compared with the other five groups that received information of some kind (personalized feedback, normative feedback and/or a recommendation). Compared to the control group, all groups that received some kind of messaging significantly reduced their gambling behavior as assessed by TL, amount of money wagered, and GGR. The results support the hypothesis that personalized behavioral feedback can enable behavioral change in gambling but that normative feedback does not appear change behavior significantly more than personalized feedback.
Keywords: behavioral feedback; human–computer interaction; online gambling; persuasive communication; problem gambling; responsible gambling.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The use of personalized behavioral feedback for online gamblers: an empirical study.Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 23;6:1406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01406. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26441779 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive Dissonance, Personalized Feedback, and Online Gambling Behavior: An Exploratory Study Using Objective Tracking Data and Subjective Self-Report.Int J Ment Health Addict. 2018;16(3):631-641. doi: 10.1007/s11469-017-9808-1. Epub 2017 Sep 20. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2018. PMID: 29904326 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Mandatory Play Breaks on Subsequent Gambling Behavior Among Norwegian Online Sports Betting, Slots and Bingo Players: A Large-scale Real World Study.J Gambl Stud. 2022 Sep;38(3):737-752. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10078-3. Epub 2021 Oct 12. J Gambl Stud. 2022. PMID: 34637034 Free PMC article.
-
[Internet gambling: what are the risks?].Encephale. 2012 Feb;38(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Apr 8. Encephale. 2012. PMID: 22381723 Review. French.
-
Psychopathology of Online Poker Players: Review of Literature.J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun;5(2):155-68. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.035. Epub 2016 Jun 27. J Behav Addict. 2016. PMID: 27348559 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Speed of Play in Gambling on Psychological and Behavioural Factors: A Critical Review.J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):393-412. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9701-7. J Gambl Stud. 2018. PMID: 28643152 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gambling Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among European Regular Sports Bettors: An Empirical Study Using Behavioral Tracking Data.Int J Ment Health Addict. 2023;21(1):20-27. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00327-8. Epub 2020 May 29. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2023. PMID: 32837423 Free PMC article.
-
Consumer Profile Segmentation in Online Lottery Gambling Utilizing Behavioral Tracking Data from the Portuguese National Lottery.J Gambl Stud. 2022 Sep;38(3):917-939. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10072-9. Epub 2021 Sep 13. J Gambl Stud. 2022. PMID: 34518986 Free PMC article.
-
Application of Health Belief Model to Practice of Responsible Gambling.J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):1047-1062. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09871-y. J Gambl Stud. 2019. PMID: 31254140
-
Use of Consumer Protection Tools on Internet Gambling Sites: Customer Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Use.J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):259-276. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09859-8. J Gambl Stud. 2020. PMID: 31119509
References
-
- Ajzen I. (1985). “From intentions to action: a theory of planned behavior,” in Action Control: from Cognitions to Behaviors eds Kuhl J., Beckman J. (New York, NY: Springer; ) 11–39.
-
- Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2013). Voluntary limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: an empirical study of gambling behaviour. J. Gambl. Stud. 29 647–660. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous