Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov 28:7:1876.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01876. eCollection 2016.

Can Psychological Expectation Models Be Adapted for Placebo Research?

Affiliations
Review

Can Psychological Expectation Models Be Adapted for Placebo Research?

Winfried Rief et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Placebo responses contribute substantially to the effect and clinical outcome of medical treatments. Patients' expectations have been identified as one of the major mechanisms contributing to placebo effects. However, to date a general theoretical framework to better understand how patient expectations interact with features of medical treatment has not been developed. In this paper we outline an expectation model that can be used as framework for experimental studies on both placebo and nocebo mechanisms. This model is based on psychological concepts of expectation development, expectation maintenance, and expectation change within the typical paradigms used in placebo research. This theoretical framework reflects the dynamic aspects of the interaction between expectations and medical treatment, and offers a platform to combine psychological and neurophysiological research activities. Moreover, this model can be used to identify important future research questions. For example, we argue that the dynamic processes of expectation maintenance vs. expectation changes are not sufficiently addressed in current research on placebo mechanisms. Therefore, the question about how to change and optimize patients' expectations prior to treatment should be a special focus of future clinical research.

Keywords: associative learning; expectation; expectation violation; nocebo; placebo; prediction error.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adaptation of the VIOL-EX model for placebo research.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acosta E., Jr. (1982). Subjective and objective determinants of expectancy: similarities and differences. Am. J. Psychol. 95, 139–160.
    1. Atkinson J. W., Reitman W. R. (1956). Performance as a function of motive strength and expectancy of goal-attainment. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 53, 361–366. 10.1037/h0043477 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barsky A. J., Saintfort R., Rogers M. P., Borus J. F. (2002). Nonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenomenon. JAMA 287, 622–626. 10.1001/jama.287.5.622 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benedetti F., Thoen W., Blanchard C., Vighetti S., Arduino C. (2013). Pain as a reward: changing the meaning of pain from negative to positive co-activates opioid and cannabinoid systems. Pain 154, 361–367. 10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bingel U., Wanigasekera V., Wiech K., Ni Mhuircheartaigh R., Lee M. C., Tracey I. (2011). The effect of treatment expectation on drug efficacy: imaging the analgesic benefit of the opioid Remifentanil. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 70ra14. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001244 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources